...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Surgery >A meta-analysis examining the use of tacker mesh fixation versus glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
【24h】

A meta-analysis examining the use of tacker mesh fixation versus glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

机译:一项荟萃分析,研究了在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中使用钉网固定与胶网固定的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to systematically analyze the randomized trials comparing tacker mesh fixation with glue mesh fixation (GMF) in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). Methods: Standard electronic database were searched to retrieve relevant randomized trials comparing tacker mesh fixation with GMF in LIHR, which were analyzed systematically using RevMan. Results: Five randomized controlled trials encompassing 1,001 patients were retrieved from the electronic databases. In a random-effects model, operating time, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and risk for hernia recurrence were statistically comparable between the 2 techniques of mesh fixation in LIHR. However, GMF was associated with a reduced risk for developing chronic groin pain. Conclusions: GMF in LIHR does not increase the risk for hernia recurrence and reduces the risk for developing chronic groin pain. It is comparable with tacker mesh fixation in terms of operation time, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and risk for hernia recurrence.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是系统分析比较腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)的粘膜网固定与胶网固定(GMF)的随机试验。方法:检索标准电子数据库以检索相关的随机试验,以比较LIHR中的GMF钉网固定,并使用RevMan进行系统分析。结果:从电子数据库中检索了5项随机对照试验,涵盖1,001名患者。在随机效应模型中,LIHR的两种网状固定技术在手术时间,术后疼痛,术后并发症,住院时间和疝复发风险方面具有统计学可比性。但是,GMF与降低慢性腹股沟疼痛的风险有关。结论:LIHR中的GMF不会增加疝复发的风险,也不会降低发生慢性腹股沟痛的风险。就手术时间,术后疼痛,术后并发症,住院时间长短和疝气复发的风险而言,它可与固定式网状固定术相媲美。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号