首页> 外文期刊>Teaching and learning in medicine >Comparison of clinical skills of 3rd-year students who completed structured clinical skills program with 6th-year students who acquired clinical skills in unsystematic way.
【24h】

Comparison of clinical skills of 3rd-year students who completed structured clinical skills program with 6th-year students who acquired clinical skills in unsystematic way.

机译:比较完成结构化临床技能课程的3年级学生与以非系统方式获得临床技能的6年级学生的临床技能的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The timing and methods of teaching clinical skills are some of the main concerns of medical education. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical skills of the 3rd and 6th-year students who acquired clinical skills training within different years and methods. METHODS: Randomly chosen students were observed and evaluated in the form of "did it-didn't do it" over the checklists composed of parameters of communication, history taking, and physical examination. The results were evaluated on the SPSS 10.0 for Windows program and Pearson chi-square test was used in the statistical analyses. RESULTS: Third-year students who had clinical skills training in early years and structured methods had better results for most of the parameters (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical skills training given through a structured program that is widespread in the early years of medical school makes a great contribution to the development of students' clinical skills.
机译:背景:教授临床技能的时机和方法是医学教育的主要关注点。目的:本研究的目的是比较在不同年份和方法下接受过临床技能培训的3年级和6年级学生的临床技能。方法:在由沟通,历史记录和体格检查参数组成的清单上,对随机选择的学生进行观察并以“是否做到了”的形式进行评估。在Windows程序的SPSS 10.0上对结果进行了评估,并在统计分析中使用了Pearson卡方检验。结果:早期接受过临床技能培训并采用结构化方法的三年级学生在大多数参数上均取得了较好的成绩(p <.05)。结论:通过在医学院早年广泛使用的结构化计划进行的临床技能培训,为学生临床技能的发展做出了巨大贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号