首页> 外文期刊>Teaching and learning in medicine >A Novel Student-Led Approach to Multiple-Choice Question Generation and Online Database Creation, With Targeted Clinician Input
【24h】

A Novel Student-Led Approach to Multiple-Choice Question Generation and Online Database Creation, With Targeted Clinician Input

机译:有针对性的临床医生输入的一种以学生为主导的新方法,用于多选题生成和在线数据库创建

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Problem: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are the main method of assessing medical student knowledge. As a result there is a high demand from medical students for formative MCQs. However, teaching staff rarely have the time or incentive to develop high-quality formative questions, focusing instead on material for high-stakes assessments. Intervention: We have developed a novel student-led approach involving an interactive online question database, created by medical students for medical students. We adopted a staged approach to create an online bank of formative MCQ questions. First, students write MCQs following a standardized format. Questions are then peer-reviewed by other students, discussing relevant clinical topics, guidelines, and journals to improve question quality. The questions are then scrutinized by specialist doctors and academics. Next, questions are piloted online. Finally, question performance is evaluated statistically. This 5-stage student-led process produced a bank of more than 200 MCQs in threemonths. Context: This intervention was carried out by two final-year medical student leads at Cardiff University School of Medicine, UK. Final-year students were recruited to write and peer-review questions, and senior content specialists were recruited from the department. After piloting and evaluation of the questions, the question bank was made available as a learning resource to all medical students at Cardiff University. Outcome: Objective analysis of the created MCQs (discrimination indices and distractor analysis) indicated that the random sample of questions piloted were of high quality. When the questions were made available as online tests to approximately 600students, usage data revealed that 2,800tests were taken over a 3-month period, indicating that the resource was popular. In addition, subjective feedback from students question writers/reviewers was gathered via free text feedback forms and was invariably positive. We plan to continue the question generation process in Cardiff and would encourage other medical schools to adopt this approach. Lessons Learned: Our 5-stage approach can generate a large volume of high-quality MCQs, addressing the demand from students for formative MCQ questions, with minimal teaching staff input. The project's benefits go beyond the creation of the resource, as involving students in the writing, review, and presentation of questions itself is useful pedagogically.
机译:问题:多项选择题(MCQ)是评估医学生知识的主要方法。结果,医学生对形成性MCQ的需求很高。但是,教学人员很少有时间或动力去提出高质量的形成性问题,而只专注于高风险评估的材料。干预:我们开发了一种新颖的由学生主导的方法,其中包括由医学生为医学生创建的交互式在线问题数据库。我们采用了分阶段的方法来创建在线的形成性MCQ问题库。首先,学生按照标准格式编写MCQ。然后,其他学生对问题进行同行评审,讨论相关的临床主题,指南和期刊以提高问题质量。然后由专科医生和学者对问题进行审查。接下来,在线试行问题。最后,对问题表现进行统计评估。这个由学生主导的5阶段流程在三个月内产生了200多个MCQ。背景:这项干预措施是由英国卡迪夫大学医学院的两名医学专业最后一年的学生领导进行的。招收了最后一年的学生来撰写和同行复习问题,并且从该系招募了高级内容专家。在对问题进行了试点和评估之后,问题库被作为学习资源提供给加的夫大学的所有医学生。结果:对创建的MCQ(歧视指数和干扰因素分析)的客观分析表明,所试问题的随机样本具有较高的质量。当这些问题可以作为大约600名学生的在线测试提供时,使用情况数据显示,在3个月的时间内进行了2800项测试,表明该资源很受欢迎。此外,通过自由文本反馈表收集了学生问题作者/审阅者的主观反馈,这些反馈始终是积极的。我们计划继续在加的夫(Cardiff)进行问题生成,并鼓励其他医学院校采用这种方法。经验教训:我们的五阶段方法可以生成大量高质量的MCQ,以最小的教学人员投入来满足学生对形成性MCQ问题的需求。该项目的好处超出了资源的创建范围,因为让学生参与写作,复习和陈述问题本身在教学上是有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号