...
首页> 外文期刊>Plastic and reconstructive surgery >Dynamic versus static splinting of simple zone V and zone VI extensor tendon repairs: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
【24h】

Dynamic versus static splinting of simple zone V and zone VI extensor tendon repairs: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

机译:简单的V区和VI区伸肌腱修复的动态与静态夹板:一项前瞻性,随机对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The authors present the first prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing postoperative dynamic versus static splinting outcomes of patients following extensor tendon repair. Patients who incurred simple and complete lacerations of their extensor tendons in zones V and VI were enrolled into the study and underwent either static splinting (n = 17) or dynamic splinting (n = 17) following primary acute repair of tendons. Total active motion was improved in the dynamic group when compared with the static group in the injured digits at 4 weeks (180.5 +/- 4 degrees versus 131.3 +/- 61 degrees; p = 0.006), at 6 weeks (239 +/- 21.9 degrees versus 205.5 +/- 53.4 degrees; p = 0.048), and at 8 weeks (247+/- 19.8 degrees versus 216.3 +/- 36 degrees; p = 0.051), but not at 6 months (253.1 +/-18.8 degrees versus 250.5 +/- 32 degrees; p = 0.562). Similarly, total active motion averaged for all digits (injured and noninjured) of the involved hand was improved in the dynamic group over the static group at 4 weeks (209.8 +/- 31.3 degrees versus 140 +/- 58.2 degrees; p < 0.001) and at 6 weeks (241.5 +/- 17.2 degrees versus 217.1 +/- 42.4 degrees; p = 0.024), but not at 8 weeks (249.6 +/- 16 degrees versus 234.8 +/- 24.5 degrees; p = 0.215) or 6 months (252.3 +/- 14 degrees versus 249.1 +/- 31 degrees; p = 0.450). Grip strength outcomes demonstrated improved grip force for the dynamic group when compared with the static group at 8 weeks (81.3 +/- 18.0 percent versus 59.2 +/- 20.4 percent; p = 0.004) but not at 6 months (89.6 +/- 5.6 percent versus 82.1 +/- 22.0 percent; p = 0.595). Patients demonstrated forceful grip greater than or equal to 80 percent of the noninjured hand in 55 percent of patients in the dynamic group versus 15 percent of patients in the static group at 8 weeks. Patients demonstrated forceful grip greater than or equal to 80 percent of the noninjured hand in 100 percent of patients in the dynamic group versus 73 percent of patients in the static group at 6 months. The authors' findings suggest that dynamic splinting of simple, complete lacerations of the extensor tendons in zones V and VI provides improved functional outcomes at 4, 6, and 8 weeks but not by 6 months when compared with static splinting. Therefore, they recommend dynamic splinting of simple, complete extensor tendon lacerations in zones V and VI only to select patients who are motivated and desire earlier return to full functional capacity.
机译:作者提出了第一项前瞻性,随机对照研究,比较了伸肌腱修复术后患者的动态夹板和静态夹板结局。将在V区和VI区发生了简单而完全的伸肌腱撕裂的患者纳入研究,并对肌腱进行一次初步急性修复后,进行了静态夹板(n = 17)或动态夹板(n = 17)。与静态组相比,动态组的总主动运动得到了改善,受伤组在第4周(180.5 +/- 4度与131.3 +/- 61度; p = 0.006)在第6周(239 +/-) 21.9度对比205.5 +/- 53.4度; p = 0.048),以及8周时(247 +/- 19.8度对比216.3 +/- 36度; p = 0.051),但不包括6个月时(253.1 +/- 18.8)度对250.5 +/- 32度; p = 0.562)。同样,在第4周,动态组的总活动运动平均水平高于静态组,而受累手的所有手指(受伤和未受伤)均得到了改善(209.8 +/- 31.3度对140 +/- 58.2度; p <0.001)并且在6周时(241.5 +/- 17.2度与217.1 +/- 42.4度; p = 0.024),但在8周时(249.6 +/- 16度与234.8 +/- 24.5度; p = 0.215)或6月(252.3 +/- 14度与249.1 +/- 31度; p = 0.450)。与静态组相比,握力强度结果显示动态组在8周时的握力有所改善(81.3 +/- 18.0%对59.2 +/- 20.4%; p = 0.004),而在6个月时则没有(89.6 +/- 5.6)百分比为82.1 +/- 22.0%; p = 0.595)。动态组患者中有55%的患者表现出大于或等于未受伤手的80%的力量,而静态组中患者在8周时表现出的力量为15%。在动态组中,100%的患者在六个月内表现出的力量大于或等于未受伤手的80%,而在静态组中,则为73%。作者的发现表明,与静态夹板相比,在V区和VI区简单,完全地伸伸肌腱撕裂的动态夹板可在4、6和8周改善功能效果,但不能在6个月时改善。因此,他们建议在V区和VI区对简单,完整的伸肌腱撕裂进行动态夹板,仅选择那些有动力并希望更早恢复全部功能的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号