首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy and psychosomatics >Outcomes of acute phase cognitive therapy in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression
【24h】

Outcomes of acute phase cognitive therapy in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression

机译:门诊焦虑与非焦虑抑郁患者急性期认知治疗的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Compared to nonanxious depressed patients, anxious depressed patients respond less to pharmacotherapy, prompting consideration of alternate treatments. Based on the transdiagnostic principles of cognitive therapy (CT), we predicted that anxious depressed patients would respond as well to CT as nonanxious depressed patients. Method: Adults (n = 523) with recurrent major depressive disorder received 12-14 weeks of CT as part of the Continuation Phase Cognitive Therapy Relapse Prevention Trial. Anxious depressed patients (n = 264; 50.4%) were compared to nonanxious depressed patients (n = 259; 49.6%) on demographic variables, initial severity, attrition, and rates and patterns of response and remission. Results: Anxious depressed patients presented with greater illness severity and had significantly lower response (55.3 vs. 68.3%) and remission rates (26.9 vs. 40.2%) based on clinician-administered measures. By contrast, smaller between-group differences for attrition, and for response (59.1 vs. 64.9%) and remission (41.7 vs. 48.7%) rates on self-report measures were not significant. Further, anxious depressed patients had greater speed of improvement on self-reported anxiety symptom severity and clinician-rated depressive and anxiety symptom severity measures. Conclusion: Consistent with prior reports, anxious depressed patients presented with greater severity and, following CT, had lower response and remission rates on clinician-administered scales. However, anxious depressed patients improved more rapidly and response and remission rates on self-report measures were not significantly different from nonanxious depressed patients. Our findings suggest that anxious depressed patients may simply need additional time or more CT sessions to reach outcomes fully comparable to those of less anxious patients.
机译:目的:与非焦虑抑郁症患者相比,焦虑抑郁症患者对药物治疗的反应较小,因此需要考虑其他治疗方法。基于认知疗法(CT)的透诊断原理,我们预测焦虑抑郁症患者对CT的反应与非焦虑抑郁症患者一样。方法:作为持续期认知疗法复发预防试验的一部分,患有复发性重度抑郁症的成年人(n = 523)接受了12-14周的CT检查。在人口统计学变量,初始严重程度,减员以及缓解和缓解的速率和方式方面,将焦虑抑郁症患者(n = 264; 50.4%)与非焦虑抑郁症患者(n = 259; 49.6%)进行了比较。结果:根据临床医生所采取的措施,焦虑抑郁症患者的病情严重程度更高,缓解率(55.3 vs. 68.3%)和缓解率(26.9 vs. 40.2%)显着降低。相比之下,自报措施的损耗,应答率(59.1 vs. 64.9%)和缓解率(41.7 vs. 48.7%)之间的较小差异并不显着。此外,焦虑抑郁症患者在自我报告的焦虑症状严重程度和临床医师评定的抑郁和焦虑症状严重程度测量上有更快的改善速度。结论:与先前的报道一致,焦虑抑郁症患者的病情严重程度较高,并且在接受CT后,按临床医生的评分,其缓解和缓解率较低。但是,焦虑抑郁症患者的改善更快,自我报告措施的反应和缓解率与非焦虑抑郁症患者无显着差异。我们的研究结果表明,焦虑抑郁症患者可能仅需要额外的时间或更多的CT疗程即可达到与焦虑程度较轻患者完全相同的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号