...
首页> 外文期刊>Quality & safety in health care >Is patient-centredness in European hospitals related to existing quality improvement strategies? Analysis of a cross-sectional survey (MARQuIS study).
【24h】

Is patient-centredness in European hospitals related to existing quality improvement strategies? Analysis of a cross-sectional survey (MARQuIS study).

机译:在欧洲医院中以患者为中心是否与现有的质量改进策略相关?横断面调查分析(MARQuIS研究)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition of patients' contributions to setting objectives for their own care, improving health outcomes and evaluating care. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent to which European hospitals have implemented strategies to promote a patient-centred approach, and to assess whether these strategies are associated with hospital characteristics and the development of the hospital's quality improvement system. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of 351 European hospital managers and professionals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' rights, patient information and empowerment, patient involvement in quality management, learning from patients, and patient hotel services at the hospital and ward level were assessed. The hypothesis that the implementation of strategies to improve patient-centredness is associated with hospital characteristics, including maturity of the hospital's quality management system, was tested using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: In general, hospitals reported high implementation of policies for patients' rights (85.5%) and informed consent (93%), whereas strategies to involve patients (71%) and learn from their experience (66%) were less frequently implemented. For 13 out of 18 hospital strategies, institutions with a more developed quality improvement system consistently reported better results (percentage differences within maturity classification ranged from 12.4% to 46.6%). The strength of association between implementation of patient-centredness strategies and the quality improvement system, however, seemed lower at the ward than at the hospital level. Some associations (OR 2.1 to 5.1) disappeared or were weaker after adjustment for potential confounding variables (OR 2.2 to 3.7). CONCLUSIONS: Although quality improvement systems seem to be effective with regard to the implementation of selected patient-centredness strategies, they seem to be insufficient to ensure widespread implementation of patient-centredness throughout the organisation.
机译:背景:人们越来越认识到患者对设定自己的护理目标,改善健康状况和评估护理的贡献。目的:量化欧洲医院实施以患者为中心的方法的策略的程度,并评估这些策略是否与医院特征和医院质量改善系统的发展有关。设计:对351名欧洲医院经理和专业人员的横断面调查。主要观察指标:评估患者的权利,患者的信息和授权,患者参与质量管理,向患者学习以及在医院和病房级别的患者酒店服务。使用二元logistic回归检验了以下假设:实施改善患者中心策略与医院特征有关,包括医院质量管理体系的成熟度。结果:总体上,医院报告患者权利政策(85.5%)和知情同意书(93%)的实施率很高,而涉及患者(71%)和从他们的经验中学习(66%)的策略实施的频率较低。在18种医院策略中的13种策略中,拥有质量改进体系更加完善的机构始终报告出更好的结果(成熟度分类中的百分比差异在12.4%到46.6%之间)。然而,病房实施的以患者为中心的策略与质量改进系统之间的联系强度似乎比医院低。在对潜在的混杂变量进行调整后(OR 2.2至3.7),一些关联(OR 2.1至5.1)消失或减弱。结论:尽管质量改进系统对于实施选定的以患者为中心的策略似乎是有效的,但它们似乎不足以确保在整个组织中广泛实施以患者为中心的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号