...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatric services: a journal of the American Psychiatric Association >Adherence to oral diabetes medications among users and nonusers of antipsychotic medication
【24h】

Adherence to oral diabetes medications among users and nonusers of antipsychotic medication

机译:抗精神病药物使用者和非使用者对口服糖尿病药物的依从性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: This study compared adherence to oral diabetes medications among users and nonusers of oral antipsychotic medications. Adherence to oral antidiabetics and antipsychotics among antipsychotic users was also compared. Methods: Texas Medicaid prescription claims data from July 1, 2008, to December 31, 2011, were used to examine adherence to oral antidiabetics among users and nonusers of antipsychotics for 12 months after the first prescription for oral diabetes medication. Users and nonusers of antipsychotics were matched on the basis of their chronic disease score (CDS). Medication adherence was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC), and patients with a PDC value ±.80 were considered to be adherent. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare adherence between cohorts. Results: A total of 1,821 patients from each group werematched. The mean PDC for oral antidiabetics was significantly higher among antipsychotic users (.63) than nonusers (.55) (p<.001). About 37% (N=678) of antipsychotic users and 24% (N=473) of nonusers were adherent to oral antidiabetics. After adjustment for age, gender, CDS, and number of prescriptions, antipsychotic users were 2.10 times more likely than nonusers to be adherent to oral antidiabetics (p<.001). Antipsychotic users had higher mean PDC values for antipsychotic medications than for oral antidiabetics (.786.25 versus .636.29, p<.001). Conclusions: Adherence to oral antidiabetics in the Texas Medicaid population was better among antipsychotic medication users than nonusers, but overall adherence was poor for both groups. Low adherence rates highlight the need for interventions to help improve medication management.
机译:目的:本研究比较了口服抗精神病药物的使用者和非使用者对口服糖尿病药物的依从性。还比较了抗精神病药物使用者对口服降糖药和抗精神病药物的依从性。方法:使用2008年7月1日至2011年12月31日的德克萨斯医疗补助处方索赔数据,检查在首次口服口服口服糖尿病药物治疗后12个月内抗精神病药物的使用者和非使用者对口服抗糖尿病药的依从性。抗精神病药的使用者和非使用者根据其慢性病评分(CDS)进行匹配。药物依从性通过覆盖天数(PDC)的比例来衡量,PDC值±.80的患者被视为依从性。使用双变量和多变量分析来比较队列之间的依从性。结果:每组共计1,821例患者匹配。抗精神病药物使用者中口服抗糖尿病药的平均PDC显着高于非使用者(.63)(.63)(p <.001)。约有37%(N = 678)的抗精神病药物使用者和24%(N = 473)的非使用者使用口服抗糖尿病药。在调整了年龄,性别,CDS和处方数量后,抗精神病药物患者坚持口服降糖药的可能性是非精神药物患者的2.10倍(p <.001)。抗精神病药物使用者的抗精神病药物平均PDC值高于口服抗糖尿病药(.786.25与.636.29,p <.001)。结论:在抗精神病药物使用者中,德克萨斯州医疗补助人群对口服抗糖尿病药的依从性优于非使用者,但两组的总体依从性均较差。依从率低表明需要采取干预措施来改善药物管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号