...
首页> 外文期刊>Public health ethics. >Medicalization, Demedicalization and Beyond: Antisocial Behaviour and the Case of the Dutch Youth Law
【24h】

Medicalization, Demedicalization and Beyond: Antisocial Behaviour and the Case of the Dutch Youth Law

机译:医疗化,非医疗化及其他:反社会行为与荷兰青年法案件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Youth antisocial behaviour (ASB) is frequently considered to be displayed by children and adolescents who suffer from behavioural disorders. Consequently, attempts to reduce ASB have increasingly comprised mental health interventions. Moreover, early signalling of children at risk and early prevention of behavioural problems are regarded as crucial remedies. Critical investigations of these developments, however, are in particular concerned with the consequent medicalization of society and the behaviour exhibited by infants, children and adolescents. Consequently, the new Dutch youth law even refers to demedicalization as a central aim. From an ethical point of view, this article critically discusses the meaning and relevance of the medicalization reproach in the context of ASB. The aim is to show that the term medicalization (M) can reasonably be attached to three different developments: the biomedical turn (M1), an increase in (forensic) youth mental health care (M2) and early signalling and prevention (M3). The ethical implications of these developments, however, are diverse, referring to both risks and benefits. By itself, neither the term medicalization nor demedicalization carries a self-evident normative meaning. Therefore, a careful ethical analysis is needed to reveal which social developments are actually recommendable or disadvantageous.
机译:青年反社会行为(ASB)通常被认为是遭受行为障碍的儿童和青少年表现出来的。因此,减少ASB的尝试越来越多地包括心理健康干预。此外,将处于危险中的儿童的早期信号和早期预防行为问题视为重要的补救措施。但是,对这些事态发展的批判性调查尤其涉及随之而来的社会医学化以及婴儿,儿童和青少年表现出的行为。因此,新的荷兰青年法律甚至将非医疗化作为主要目标。从道德的角度来看,本文从ASB的角度批判性地讨论了医学化指责的意义和相关性。目的是表明术语“医疗化”(M)可以合理地附加到三个不同的方面:生物医学转向(M1),(法医)青年精神保健(M2)的增加以及早期信号和预防(M3)。然而,这些事态发展在伦理上的含义是多种多样的,既涉及风险也涉及利益。就其本身而言,术语医学化或非医学化都不具有不言而喻的规范含义。因此,需要进行认真的伦理分析,以揭示哪些社会发展实际上是可取的或不利的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号