首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prehospital cardiac arrest patients in Singapore.
【24h】

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prehospital cardiac arrest patients in Singapore.

机译:新加坡院前心脏骤停患者的旁观者心肺复苏。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The chain of survival emphasizes the importance of the four links associated with survival after cardiac arrest (CA). The involvement of laypersons has been increasing over the years. They have been contributing toward "early access," "early cardiopulmonary resuscitation" (CPR), and, of late, "early defibrillation," with the advent of automated external defibrillators (AEDs). Bystander CPR rates are difficult to assess due to the lack of formal documentation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the bystander CPR rate for CA patients brought to the emergency department (ED) of an urban, tertiary teaching hospital in the central part of Singapore, over a period of 12 months. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study carried out from May 1, 1999, to April 30, 2000. "Bystander CPR" refers to an attempt to perform basic CPR by someone who is not part of an organized emergency response system. In general, this refers to the person who witnesses the arrest. RESULTS: There were 155 adult patients with CA who satisfied the inclusion criteria over the 12-month period. The median age was 62.1 +/- 6.4 years, and the majority of patients were brought in by ambulances (126, or 81.3%). There were 142 (91.6%) non-trauma and 13 (8.4%) trauma CAs. Most patients had the CA at home (96, or 61.9%), and the most common initial rhythm at presentation upon the arrival of the paramedics was ventricular fibrillation (VF) (50 patients, or 32.2%). The bystander CPR rate was 20.0% (i.e., 31 of the 155 patients). A total of 32 (20.6%) patients had return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC, defined as the return of a palpable pulse) and 31 (96.9%, or 31/32) of them were those who had some form of bystander CPR performed. Of these 31 who had bystander CPR, four (12.9%) were subsequently admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), while among those who did not have bystander CPR, all had death pronounced in the ED. Of the four patients admitted to the ICU, three (3 of 4, or 75.0%; or 3 of 155 CA patients, or 1.9%) were subsequently discharged alive from the hospital. CONCLUSION: The bystander CPR rate for prehospital CA was 20.0%. About 12.9% (4 patients) of those who had bystander CPR were admitted to the ICU, compared with none from the group that did not receive any form of bystander CPR. Three patients (1.9% of all prehospital CAs) were discharged alive from the hospital.
机译:简介:生存链强调与心脏骤停(CA)后生存相关的四个环节的重要性。多年来,非专业人士的参与一直在增加。随着自动体外除颤器(AED)的出现,他们为“尽早进入”,“早期心肺复苏”(CPR)以及最近的“早期除颤”做出了贡献。由于缺乏正式文件,很难评估旁观者的心肺复苏率。目的:评估在12个月内带到新加坡中部城市三级教学医院急诊室的急诊室(CA)患者的旁观者CPR率。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,从1999年5月1日至2000年4月30日进行。“旁观者心肺复苏术”是指不属于有组织的应急系统的人员进行基本心肺复苏术的尝试。通常,这是指目击者。结果:在过去的12个月中,有155名成年CA患者符合入选标准。中位年龄为62.1 +/- 6.4岁,大多数患者是由救护车带入的(126例,占81.3%)。有142个(91.6%)非创伤性损伤和13个(8.4%)创伤性CA。大多数患者在家中都有CA(96例,占61.9%),护理人员到达时出现的最常见的初始心律是室颤(VF)(50例,占32.2%)。旁观者的CPR率为20.0%(即155例患者中的31例)。共有32(20.6%)例患者出现了自发性循环(ROSC,定义为可触及的脉搏恢复),其中31例(96.9%或31/32)是进行了某种形式的旁观者CPR的患者。在这31位有旁观者心肺复苏术的人中,有4名(12.9%)随后被送往重症监护病房(ICU),而在那些没有旁观者心肺复苏术的人中,所有人在ED中均宣告死亡。在入住ICU的四名患者中,有三名(4名中的3名,占75.0%; 155名CA患者中的3名,占1.9%)随后被送出医院。结论:院前CA的旁观者CPR率为20.0%。患有旁观者心肺复苏术的患者中约有12.9%(4例)被送入ICU,而没有接受任何形式的旁观者心肺复苏术的人群中没有人。三名患者(占所有院前CA的1.9%)从医院复活。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号