...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Collaborative effects of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and prehospital advanced cardiac life support by physicians on survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide population-based observational study
【24h】

Collaborative effects of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and prehospital advanced cardiac life support by physicians on survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide population-based observational study

机译:旁观者发起的心肺复苏和医生对院前心脏高级生命支持对院外心脏骤停生存的协同作用:一项基于全国人群的观察性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionThere are inconsistent data about the effectiveness of prehospital physician-staffed advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) on the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Furthermore, the relative importance of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and ACLS and the effectiveness of their combination have not been clearly demonstrated.MethodsUsing a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry of all OHCA patients in Japan, we enrolled 95,072 patients whose arrests were witnessed by bystanders and 23,127 patients witnessed by emergency medical service providers between 2005 and 2007. We divided the bystander-witnessed arrest patients into Group A (ACLS by emergency life-saving technicians without BCPR), Group B (ACLS by emergency life-saving technicians with BCPR), Group C (ACLS by physicians without BCPR) and Group D (ACLS by physicians with BCPR). The outcome data included 1-month survival and neurological outcomes determined by the cerebral performance category.ResultsAmong the 95,072 bystander-witnessed arrest patients, 7,722 (8.1%) were alive at 1 month, including 2,754 (2.9%) with good performance and 3,171 (3.3%) with vegetative status or worse. BCPR occurred in 42% of bystander-witnessed arrests. In comparison with Group A, the rates of good-performance survival were significantly higher in Group B (odds ratio (OR), 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 2.05 to 2.42; P < 0.01) and Group D (OR, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 2.28 to 3.43; P < 0.01), while no significant difference was seen for Group C (OR, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.61; P = 0.32). The occurrence of vegetative status or worse at 1 month was highest in Group C (OR, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.55 to 2.37; P < 0.01).ConclusionsIn this registry-based study, BCPR significantly improved the survival of OHCA with good cerebral outcome. The groups with BCPR and ACLS by physicians had the best outcomes. However, receiving ACLS by physicians without preceding BCPR significantly increased the number of patients with neurologically unfavorable outcomes.
机译:简介院前医生配备高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的效果的数据不一致。此外,还没有清楚证明由旁观者发起的心肺复苏(BCPR)和ACLS的相对重要性及其组合的有效性。方法使用日本所有OHCA患者的前瞻性,全国性,人群为基础的登记资料,我们招募了95,072名患者在2005年至2007年之间,有旁观者目击了逮捕,有23127名患者被紧急医疗服务提供者目击了。我们将目击者目击者分为A组(不使用BCPR的紧急救生技术人员为ACLS),B组(紧急情况为ACLS) BCPR节省技术人员),C组(无BCPR的医师为ACLS)和D组(有BCPR的医师为ACLS)。结果数据包括1个月生存期和根据脑功能类别确定的神经系统结果。结果在95,072名旁观者逮捕的患者中,有1个月的存活率为7,722(8.1%),其中表现良好的有2,754(2.9%)和3,171(1) 3.3%)具有营养状况或更差。 BCPR发生在42%的旁观者被捕者中。与A组相比,B组(优势比(OR)为2.23; 95%置信区间为2.05至2.42; P <0.01)和D组(OR为2.80; 95)的良好生存率显着更高%置信区间为2.28至3.43; P <0.01),而C组的差异无统计学意义(OR为1.18; 95%置信区间为0.86至1.61; P = 0.32)。 C组在1个月时营养状态或更严重的发生率最高(OR为1.92; 95%置信区间为1.55至2.37; P <0.01)。结论在这项基于注册表的研究中,BCPR显着改善了OHCA的存活率,脑结局。由医师进行BCPR和ACLS治疗的组结果最佳。但是,在未进行BCPR的情况下由医师接受ACLS会显着增加神经系统疾病预后不良的患者人数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号