首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy theory and practice >Undergraduate physiotherapy students' competencies, attitudes and perceptions after integrated educational pathways in evidence-based practice: A mixed methods study
【24h】

Undergraduate physiotherapy students' competencies, attitudes and perceptions after integrated educational pathways in evidence-based practice: A mixed methods study

机译:在循证实践中综合教育途径后,本科物理治疗学生的能力,态度和看法:混合方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This mixed methods study aimed to explore perceptions/attitudes, to evaluate knowledge/skills, to investigate clinical behaviours of undergraduate physiotherapy students exposed to a composite education curriculum on evidence-based practice (EBP). Students' knowledge and skills were assessed before and after integrated learning activities, using the Adapted Fresno test, whereas their behaviour in EBP was evaluated by examining their internship documentation. Students' perceptions and attitudes were explored through four focus groups. Sixty-two students agreed to participate in the study. The within group mean differences (A-Fresno test) were 34.2 (95% CI 24.4 to 43.9) in the first year and 35.1 (95% CI 23.2 to 47.1) in the second year; no statistically significant change was observed in the third year. Seventy-six percent of the second year and 88% of the third year students reached the pass score. Internship documentation gave evidence of PICOs and database searches (95-100%), critical appraisal of internal validity (25-75%) but not of external validity (5-15%). The correct application of these items ranged from 30 to 100%. Qualitative analysis of the focus groups indicated students valued EBP, but perceived many barriers, with clinicians being both an obstacle and a model. Key elements for changing students' behaviours seem to be internship environment and possibility of continuous practice and feedback.
机译:这项混合方法研究旨在探索感知/态度,评估知识/技能,调查暴露于循证实践(EBP)综合教育课程的物理治疗本科生的临床行为。在学生进行综合学习活动之前和之后,使用适应性弗雷斯诺测验对学生的知识和技能进行了评估,而通过检查实习文档来评估他们在EBP中的行为。通过四个焦点小组探讨了学生的看法和态度。六十二名学生同意参加研究。组内平均差异(A-Fresno检验)第一年为34.2(95%CI 24.4至43.9),第二年为35.1(95%CI 23.2至47.1)。第三年没有观察到统计学上的显着变化。第二年的百分之七十六和第三年的百分之八十八的学生达到及格分数。实习文档提供了PICO和数据库搜索的证据(95-100%),对内部有效性的严格评估(25-75%),对外部有效性的关键评估(5-15%)。这些项目的正确应用范围是30%至100%。对焦点小组的定性分析表明,学生重视EBP,但意识到许多障碍,临床医生既是障碍也是模型。改变学生行为的关键因素似乎是实习环境以及不断练习和反馈的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号