首页> 外文期刊>Physiology & behavior >Impact of dose-response calorie reduction or supplementation of a covertly manipulated lunchtime meal on energy compensation
【24h】

Impact of dose-response calorie reduction or supplementation of a covertly manipulated lunchtime meal on energy compensation

机译:剂量反应卡路里的减少或暗中操作午餐时间对能量补偿的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Numerous studies have examined energy compensation following overfeeding regimes whereas much less is known about the impact of acute underfeeding on energy compensation and fewer still have compared energy reduction and addition in the same group of individuals. This study compared the effects of consuming lunches with varying energy content (7.2-fold difference) on subsequent energy intake. A total of 27 healthy males took part in this randomized, crossover study with five treatments: 163 kcal (very low energy meal, VLEM), 302 kcal (low energy meal, LEM), 605 kcal (control), 889 kcal (high energy meal, HEM), and 1176 kcal (very high energy meal, VHEM) served as a noodle soup. Participants were instructed to consume a standardized breakfast in the morning and they were provided with one of the five treatments for lunch on non-consecutive test day. Test lunches were matched for palatability, sensory properties, and volume. Participants were provided with an afternoon snack and ad libitum dinner on each test day and recorded food intake for the rest of the day. Appetite ratings were measured at regular intervals. As the energy content of treatments increased, participants' hunger, desire to eat, and prospective consumption decreased significantly whereas fullness increased significantly. However, no significant difference in subsequent meal intake was found between the treatments (P = 0.458): 1003 kcal VLEM, 1010 kcal LEM, 1011 kcal control, 940 kcal HEM, and 919 kcal VHEM. Total daily energy intake was statistically significantly different between the treatments (P < 0.001) and was varied directly with the energy content of the lunchtime meal. Despite the large difference in energy content between the treatments, participants did not compensate for the "missing calories" or "additional calories" at subsequent meals. These results suggest that covertly manipulated, equally palatable, sensory and volume matched meals have the potential to promote either positive or negative energy balance if the effects seen in this single meal study are sustained. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:大量研究检查了过量喂养后的能量补偿,而对于急性不足喂养对能量补偿的影响知之甚少,在同一组人中比较了减少能量和增加能量的比例仍然较少。这项研究比较了吃不同能量含量(相差7.2倍)的午餐对随后能量摄入的影响。共有27位健康男性参加了这项随机,交叉研究,其中包括5种治疗方法:163 kcal(极低能量餐,VLEM),302 kcal(低能量餐,LEM),605 kcal(对照),889 kcal(高能量)餐,HEM)和1176大卡(非常高能量的餐,VHEM)用作面条汤。指示参与者在早上食用标准早餐,并且在非连续考试当天向他们提供五种午餐治疗方法之一。测试午餐的可口性,感官特性和体积相匹配。在每个测试日为参与者提供下午点心和随意晚餐,并记录当天其余时间的食物摄入量。定期评估食欲等级。随着治疗能量含量的增加,参与者的饥饿感,进食欲望和预期消费量显着降低,而饱腹感则显着增加。然而,治疗之间的后续进餐量没有显着差异(P = 0.458):1003 kcal VLEM,1010 kcal LEM,1011 kcal对照,940 kcal HEM和919 kcal VHEM。两种疗法之间的每日总能量摄入在统计学上有显着差异(P <0.001),并随午餐时间的能量含量而直接变化。尽管两种疗法之间的能量含量差异很大,但参与者并没有补偿随后进餐时的“卡路里丢失”或“其他卡路里”。这些结果表明,如果在这项单餐研究中所观察到的效果持续存在,隐秘地操作,同样可口,感官和数量相匹配的膳食有可能促进正能量或负能量平衡。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号