首页> 外文期刊>World intellectual property report >General Court Revisits Proof of Dilution
【24h】

General Court Revisits Proof of Dilution

机译:普通法院重新审查稀释证明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The EU General Court has ruled that demonstrating detriment to a trade mark's distinctive character does not require proof of a change in economic behaviour of the average consumer of the goods or services for which the mark is registered. Although this point had been considered by the European Court of Justice in a previous case, the General Court interpreted Article 8(5) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation differently, finding that such effect would be inevitable following the dispersal of the identity of the earlier mark as a result of dilution, such that no separate evidence was required.
机译:欧盟总法院裁定,证明损害商标独特性并不需要证明商标注册商品或服务的普通消费者的经济行为发生变化。尽管欧洲法院在先前的案例中已经考虑到了这一点,但普通法院对《共同体商标条例》第8条第5款的解释有所不同,发现随着先前商标的散布,这种影响将不可避免。由于稀释而产生的商标,因此不需要单独的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号