...
首页> 外文期刊>World intellectual property report >A Comparative Look at Bowman v. Monsanto in the European Context
【24h】

A Comparative Look at Bowman v. Monsanto in the European Context

机译:欧洲背景下鲍曼诉孟山都的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On May 13, 2013, the US Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and of the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, holding in favour of Monsanto in the Bowman v. Monsanto dispute (see "US Supreme Court Says No Patent Exhaustion for Monsanto Roundup Seeds" [27 WIPR 22, 6/1/13]). Monsanto invented and patented a technology to make plants genetically resistant to herbicide glyphosate. All the methods and customary tools employed to endow the plant with the new genetic traits were protected by US Patent 5,352,605 and its re-examined form RE 39,247. The patent covers in particular a glyphosate-resistant soybean plant and its seeds marketed under the Roundup Ready (RR) trademark.
机译:2013年5月13日,美国最高法院维持了联邦巡回上诉法院和印第安纳州南部地区地方法院的判决,在鲍曼诉孟山都纠纷中支持孟山都。最高法院说孟山都抗草甘膦种子没有专利权耗尽” [27 WIPR 22,6/1/13]。孟山都公司(Monsanto)发明了一项专利技术,该技术可使植物对除草剂草甘膦具有基因抗性。使植物具有新遗传特征的所有方法和惯用工具均受到美国专利5,352,605及其复审的RE 39,247的保护。该专利特别涵盖了抗草甘膦的大豆植物及其种子,以Roundup Ready(RR)商标销售。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号