首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Bowman v. Monsanto: Supreme Court's Limited Ruling Does Not Address Other Self-Replicating Technology or the Conditional Sale Doctrine
【24h】

Bowman v. Monsanto: Supreme Court's Limited Ruling Does Not Address Other Self-Replicating Technology or the Conditional Sale Doctrine

机译:鲍曼诉孟山都案:最高法院的有限裁定未涉及其他自我复制技术或有条件销售原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Kagan, on May 13,2013, the US Supreme Court held that the patent exhaustion doctrine does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission. By using seeds that were only licensed to grow a single commercial crop to instead grow multiple new generations of seed, Vernon Bowman infringed Monsanto's patents for the Roundup Ready trait used in soybean seeds. In affirming the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Supreme Court expressly limited its holding to application of the exhaustion doctrine in the context of self-replicating seeds. The Supreme Court's opinion did, however, suggest the possibility of a different result if the self-replication occurred outside the purchaser's control or if the self-replication was "a necessary but incidental step in using the item for another purpose."
机译:在2013年5月13日,卡根大法官的一致意见中,美国最高法院裁定,专利权耗尽原则不允许农民未经专利持有人的许可,通过种植和收获来复制专利种子。弗农·鲍曼(Vernon Bowman)使用仅被许可用于种植单一商品作物的种子来种植多个新一代种子,从而侵犯了孟山都公司在大豆种子中使用的抗农达性状的专利。在确认美国联邦巡回上诉法院的裁决时,最高法院明确将其裁定限于在自我复制种子的范围内适用穷竭原则。但是,最高法院的意见确实表明,如果自我复制发生在购买者的控制范围之外,或者自我复制是“将物品用于其他目的的必要但偶然的步骤”,则可能会有不同结果的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号