首页> 外文期刊>The World Economy >US trade wars in the twenty-first century with emerging countries: Make America and its partners lose again
【24h】

US trade wars in the twenty-first century with emerging countries: Make America and its partners lose again

机译:二十一世纪美国与新兴国家的贸易战:使美国及其伙伴再次失败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a context of rising protectionist rhetoric, this paper looks at the potential impact of trade wars initiated by a change in US trade policies. We use a static multicountry, multisector general equilibrium model to evaluate six modalities of three potential trade warsfor a total of 18 scenariosbetween the USA and China, between the USA and Mexico, and a combination of the two previous conflicts. In each case, we evaluate various forms of trade retaliation by the US partner(s): the same level of import duty as the one imposed by the USA, an import duty that minimises welfare loss, a duty that minimises terms-of-trade deterioration, a duty that generates the same amount of collected revenue, and finally a Nash equilibrium. We conclude that there is no scenario in which the US government augments its domestic welfare or GDP. There may be sectoral gains in value added in the USA, but they are small and to the detriment of other sectors. While losses for China are relatively small, potential losses for the Mexican economy are significant. There are also free riders of these trade wars. Finally, the way in which trade retaliations are designed matters greatly.
机译:在贸易保护主义言论愈演愈烈的背景下,本文着眼于美国贸易政策变化引发的贸易战的潜在影响。我们使用静态的多国,多部门一般均衡模型来评估三种潜在贸易战的六种模式,分别针对美中之间,美墨之间的18种情况以及前两次冲突的组合。在每种情况下,我们都会评估美国合作伙伴进行的各种形式的贸易报复:与美国相同的进口关税,使福利损失最小的进口关税,使贸易条件最小的关税恶化,产生相同收入额的义务,最终达到纳什均衡。我们得出的结论是,在任何情况下,美国政府都无法增加其国内福利或GDP。在美国,可能会有部门增加值的增加,但增值幅度很小,并且有损其他部门。尽管中国的损失相对较小,但墨西哥经济的潜在损失却很大。也有这些贸易战的搭便车者。最后,设计贸易报复的方式非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号