首页> 外文期刊>Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation >Manual materials handling: Knowledge and practices among Portuguese Health and Safety practitioners
【24h】

Manual materials handling: Knowledge and practices among Portuguese Health and Safety practitioners

机译:手动材料处理:葡萄牙健康和安全从业人员的知识和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: There are several methodologies to assess the risk involved in Manual Materials Handling (MMH). The aim of this study was to identify the knowledge and use of risk assessment methods among Portuguese Health and Safety (H&S) practitioners.Participants: The study involved the participation of 331 H&S practitioners and other related prevention professionals. Method: An e-mail invitation to complete an online survey was sent to all Portuguese registered H&S practitioners. The previously developed and validated questionnaire included three different sections: (1) company characteristics; (2) description of types of MMH tasks performed; and (3) the respondents' use of and knowledge about risk assessment methods for MMH tasks. Results: The answers obtained were collected from almost 350 companies. The characteristics of the companies showed that there is a predominance of external and internal H&S services for Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) and large companies, respectively. The NIOSH equation, Key Indicator Method (KIM) and Manual Assessment Chart (MAC) were identified as the most used and recognised risk assessment methods. Conclusion: Questionnaire results show that an important number of Portuguese H&S practitioners recognise some methods but have difficulty applying them correctly. Some practitioners reported that they had never used any type of risk assessment method.
机译:目的:有几种方法可以评估手动物料处理(MMH)涉及的风险。这项研究的目的是在葡萄牙健康与安全(H&S)从业人员中识别风险评估方法的知识和使用。参与者:该研究涉及331名H&S从业人员和其他相关的预防专业人员。方法:向所有葡萄牙注册的H&S从业人员发送了一封电子邮件,以完成在线调查。先前开发和验证的问卷包括三个不同部分:(1)公司特征; (2)描述执行的MMH任务的类型; (3)受访者对MMH任务的风险评估方法的使用和知识。结果:所获得的答案是从近350家公司收集的。这些公司的特征表明,分别为中小型企业(SME)和大型公司提供外部和内部H&S服务。 NIOSH公式,关键指标方法(KIM)和人工评估表(MAC)被确定为最常用和公认的风险评估方法。结论:问卷调查结果表明,很多葡萄牙H&S从业人员都认可某些方法,但难以正确应用它们。一些从业人员报告说,他们从未使用过任何类型的风险评估方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号