首页> 外文期刊>IEEE transactions on very large scale integration (VLSI) systems >Comparison of adaptive body bias (ABB) and adaptive supply voltage (ASV) for improving delay and leakage under the presence of process variation
【24h】

Comparison of adaptive body bias (ABB) and adaptive supply voltage (ASV) for improving delay and leakage under the presence of process variation

机译:比较自适应主体偏置(ABB)和自适应电源电压(ASV)以在存在工艺变化的情况下改善延迟和泄漏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Process variations as a percentage of nominal delay and power consumption are becoming more and more severe with continuing scaling of VLSI technology. The worsening process variation causes increased variability in performance, power, and reliability of VLSI circuits. Thus, performance and power consumption targets obtained during the design phase of VLSI circuits may significantly deviate from that of actual silicon resulting in significant yield losses. Adaptive body bias (ABB) has been shown to be an effective method of postsilicon tuning to reduce variability under the presence of process variation. Post silicon tuning can also be accomplished by using adaptive supply voltage (ASV). This paper compares the effectiveness of ABB and ASV in reducing variability and improving performance and power, and thus, yield.
机译:随着VLSI技术的不断扩展,工艺变化在标称延迟和功耗中所占的百分比变得越来越严重。不断变化的工艺变化会导致VLSI电路的性能,功率和可靠性的变化性增加。因此,在VLSI电路设计阶段获得的性能和功耗目标可能会与实际硅明显不同,从而导致明显的良率损失。自适应体偏置(ABB)已被证明是一种有效的后硅调整方法,可在存在工艺差异的情况下降低可变性。硅后调整也可以通过使用自适应电源电压(ASV)来实现。本文比较了ABB和ASV在降低可变性,改善性能和功率以及提高产量方面的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号