首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >USE OF BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN TMDL ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
【24h】

USE OF BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN TMDL ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION

机译:在TMDL评估和实施中使用生物指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most states in the U.S. have a general water quality standard intended to protect water from all potential pollutants not specifically named or identified in other standards. Biological indicators are used, in part, to assess the level of water quality with respect to this general standard. Under EPA's Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program, impaired waters based on a biological assessment require an additional step compared with non-biological TMDLs. In non-biological TMDLs, the "pollutant" is typically the parameter being monitored, with a direct link to the impairment. In biological TMDLs, cause and effect must first be established between one or more pollutants and the impacted biological community. This article presents examples of approaches taken in different states to monitor and assess the biological health of our streams based on varying combinations of algal, macroinvertebrate, and fish communities. While fish are the ultimate integrator of lower ecological organisms, their occurrence and abundance has been greatly manipulated by humankind. Periphytic algae are perhaps the fastest responding biological population and can be used for some pollutant-specific diagnoses, but most states lack the expertise required for detailed taxonomic classification. Macroinvertebrates, the most commonly monitored biological community, are abundant in most streams, but most metrics are not diagnostic of specific stressors. Within the TMDL framework, issues are discussed related to setting TMDL targets, linking biological impairments with pollutants, and defining biological target endpoints. Although surrogate measures are often used for setting TMDL target loads, biological recovery is measured against biological endpoints. The use of biological indicators for assessment and development of biological TMDLs can be improved through modeling procedures that better define cause-and-effect relationships, through a better understanding of the limits of restoration, and through a more unified national policy that focuses on restoration
机译:美国大多数州都有通用的水质标准,旨在保护水免受其他标准未明确命名或标识的所有潜在污染物的侵害。生物指标部分用于评估与本通用标准有关的水质水平。根据EPA的总最大日负荷(TMDL)计划,与非生物TMDL相比,基于生物学评估的受损水域需要采取额外的步骤。在非生物TMDL中,“污染物”通常是要监视的参数,与损害直接相关。在生物TMDL中,必须首先在一种或多种污染物与受影响的生物群落之间建立因果关系。本文介绍了在不同状态下基于藻类,大型无脊椎动物和鱼类群落的不同组合来监测和评估河流生物健康的方法的示例。尽管鱼类是低等生态有机体的最终整合者,但是它们的出现和丰度却受到人类的极大操纵。附生藻类可能是响应最快的生物种群,可以用于某些污染物的特定诊断,但是大多数州缺乏详细分类学分类所需的专业知识。大型无脊椎动物是最常受监视的生物群落,在大多数溪流中都很丰富,但是大多数指标不能诊断特定的应激源。在TMDL框架内,讨论了与设置TMDL目标,将生物损害与污染物联系在一起以及确定生物目标终点有关的问题。尽管通常使用替代措施来设置TMDL目标负荷,但还是根据生物学终点来测量生物学恢复。通过更好地定义因果关系的建模程序,通过更好地了解恢复的局限性以及通过以恢复为重点的更统一的国家政策,可以改善将生物学指标用于评估和开发生物TMDL的方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transactions of the ASABE》 |2006年第4期|p.00001023-00001032|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Gene Yagow, ASABE Member Engineer, Research Scientist, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia;

    Bruce Wilson, ASABE Member Engineer, Professor, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota;

    Puneet Srivastava, ASABE Member Engineer, Assistant Professor, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama;

    and Christopher C. Obropta, Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Corresponding author: Gene Yagow, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, 307 Seitz Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Algae; Benthic macroinvertebrates; Bioassessment; Biological indicator; Fish; Periphyton; Stressor analysis; TMDL; Water quality; Watershed;

    机译:藻类;底栖大型无脊椎动物;生物评估;生物指标;鱼;附生植物;压力源分析;TMDL;水质;分水岭;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号