首页> 外文期刊>Teachers and Teaching >'Yes, but if we have students think all day when will we get anything done?': two conceptual resources to engage students in democratically dangerous teaching
【24h】

'Yes, but if we have students think all day when will we get anything done?': two conceptual resources to engage students in democratically dangerous teaching

机译:“是的,但是如果我们让学生整日思考,什么时候可以完成任何事情?”:两种概念性资源,可让学生参与民主危险的教学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While the politics of curriculum reform occupy adults, high stakes get played out in crowded classrooms. As a component of democratic inquiry, how might teachers engage students in a study of those agendas shaping their education? What sorts of conceptual resources could help? To begin to answer these questions, I briefly review scholars who address the emergence in several countries of what Kliebard names as a 'social efficiency' agenda in education. I then examine two strong examples of literature in 'authentic' practices as a curriculum conversation contesting this agenda. While supportive of the intent of scholars concerned with authentic practices, I assert that they insufficiently address ways in which students might engage with issues shaping their experience of formal education and offer two conceptual resources with which to do so.
机译:尽管课程改革的政治占据了成年人,但在拥挤的教室中却发挥了很大的作用。作为民主探究的组成部分,教师如何使学生参与对构成其教育的议程的研究?什么样的概念性资源可以帮助您?为了开始回答这些问题,我简要回顾一下学者,这些学者探讨了Kliebard称之为教育中“社会效率”议程的几个国家的崛起。然后,我将在“真实的”实践中考察文学的两个有力的例子,作为对这一议程的争辩的课程对话。虽然支持学者关注真实做法的意图,但我断言他们没有充分解决学生可能参与的各种形式的问题,这些问题影响了他们接受正规教育的经验,并提供了两种概念性资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号