首页> 外文期刊>Surgical infections >Effective Cohorting and'Superisolation'in a Single Intensive Care Unit in Response to an Outbreak of Diverse Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms
【24h】

Effective Cohorting and'Superisolation'in a Single Intensive Care Unit in Response to an Outbreak of Diverse Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms

机译:应对多种耐多药生物的爆发,在单个加护病房中进行有效的分组和“超级隔离”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Cohorting patients in dedicated hospital wards or wings during infection outbreaks reduces transmission of organisms, yet frequently, this may not be feasible because of inadequate capacity, especially in the intensive care unit (ICU). We hypothesized that cohorting isolation patients in one geographic location in a single ICU and using enhanced isolation procedures ("superisolation") can prevent the further spread of highly multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO).rnMethods: Six patients dispersed throughout our Surgical Trauma Burn ICU had infections with carbapenem-resistant, non-clonal gram-negative MDRO, namely Klebsiella pneumoniae, Citrobacter freundii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Aeromonas hydrophilia, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Providencia rettgeri. Five of the six patients also had simultaneous isolation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Under threat of unit closure and after all standard isolation procedures had been enacted, these six patients were moved to the front six beds of the unit, the front entrance was closed, and all traffic was redirected through the back entrance. Nursing staff were assigned to either two isolation or two non-isolation patients. In accordance with the practice of Sem-melweis, rounds were conducted so as to end at the rooms of the patients with the most highly-resistant bacterial infections.rnResults: A few months after these interventions, all six patients had been discharged from the ICU (three alive and three dead), and no new cases of infection with any of their pathogens (based on species and antibiogram) or VRE occurred. The mean ICU stay and overall hospital length of stay for these six patients were 78.3 days and 117.2 days respectively, with a mortality rate of 50%.rnConclusion: Cohorting patients to one area and altering work routines to minimize contact with patients with MDRO (essentially designating a "high-risk" zone) may be beneficial in stopping patient-to-patient spread of highly resistant bacteria without the need for a dedicated isolation unit.
机译:背景:在感染暴发期间在专用的医院病房或机翼中为患者分组减少了生物体的传播,但是由于能力不足,这常常是不可行的,尤其是在重症监护病房(ICU)中。我们假设在单个ICU中将地理位置隔离的患者分组并使用增强的隔离程序(“超级隔离”)可以防止高度耐多药生物体(MDRO)进一步扩散。方法:六名散布在我们手术创伤中的患者烧伤ICU感染了耐碳青霉烯的非克隆革兰氏阴性MDRO,即肺炎克雷伯菌,弗氏柠檬酸杆菌,嗜麦芽单胞菌,嗜水气单胞菌,变形杆菌,绿脓杆菌和普罗维登斯氏菌。六名患者中有五名同时分离出了耐万古霉素的肠球菌(VRE)。在单位关闭的威胁下,在制定了所有标准隔离程序后,这六名患者被转移到了该单位的前六张病床,前门被关闭,所有交通被重新定向通过后门。护理人员被分配给两名孤立患者或两名非孤立患者。根据Sem-melweis的做法,进行了巡回检查,以在耐药性最高的细菌感染患者的房间结束。结果:在这些干预措施几个月后,所有6例患者均已从ICU出院(3活着,3死了),并且没有发生任何新的病原体感染(基于物种和抗菌素)或VRE的病例。这六名患者的平均ICU住院天数和总住院天数分别为78.3天和117.2天,死亡率为50%。结论:将患者分组到一个区域并更改工作程序以最大程度地减少与MDRO患者的接触(基本上是指定“高风险”区可能有利于阻止高耐药菌在患者之间的传播,而无需专用的隔离装置。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Surgical infections》 |2011年第5期|p.345-350|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Surgery University of Virginia P.O. Box 800300 Charlottesville, VA 22908;

    rnDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

    rnDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

    rnDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

    rnDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

    rnDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

    rnDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号