首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Philosophy and Education >Art, Politics, and the Pedagogical Relation
【24h】

Art, Politics, and the Pedagogical Relation

机译:艺术,政治与教学关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent years the French philosopher Jacques Rancière has addressed the predicament of artists and curators who, in their eagerness to convey a critical message or engage their viewers in an emancipatory process, end up predetermining the outcomes of the experience, hence blocking its critical or emancipatory potential. In this essay I consider Rancière’s writing on this topic and draw out the parallels with the predicament of teachers and curriculum designers who have critical and emancipatory objectives. The risk of education that strives for emancipation is that it can become so directive in steering students to the “right” outcomes that it does not leave these students any intellectual room. Rancière’s work is helpful in reminding us that teachers and curricula with explicitly critical, political, emancipatory objectives can defeat their own purposes and become stultifying if they do not leave the student room to use her or his own intelligence.
机译:近年来,法国哲学家雅克·兰西埃(JacquesRancière)解决了艺术家和策展人的困境,他们渴望传达批判性的信息或让观看者参与解放的过程,最终确定了体验的结果,从而阻碍了批评或解放的经历。潜在。在本文中,我考虑了兰契尔(Rancière)关于该主题的文章,并提出了与具有关键性和解放性目标的教师和课程设计者的困境相似的地方。争取解放的教育的风险在于,它可以指导学生走向“正确的”结果,以至于没有为这些学生留出任何知识空间。兰契尔(Rancière)的工作有助于提醒我们,具有明显关键性,政治性和解放性目标的教师和课程可能违反他们自己的目的,并且如果他们不离开学生间来使用自己的智力,就会变得僵化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号