首页> 外文期刊>Spectrum, IEEE >Education: Engineering curricula: `Professional¿ vs. `two-track¿: In the debate over possible changes in engineering education, one of the key questions is what is meant by `professional school¿
【24h】

Education: Engineering curricula: `Professional¿ vs. `two-track¿: In the debate over possible changes in engineering education, one of the key questions is what is meant by `professional school¿

机译:教育:工程课程:“专业”与“两轨制”:在关于工程教育可能变化的辩论中,关键问题之一是“专业学校”的含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Engineers in industry have complained frequently about the kind of engineering education that takes place in colleges today. Engineers in academe are quick to defend their accomplishments and poke holes in the arguments of their detractors. Much of the current debate centers around two proposals. The National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) has issued a call for ¿professional schools of engineering¿ that are ¿independent¿ (see box on p. 54). The other is a change to a two-track system that offers a four-year bachelor's degree in general engineering or a five-year practice-oriented master's that might be the first professional degree.
机译:工业工程师经常抱怨如今在大学中进行的工程教育。学术界的工程师们会迅速捍卫自己的成就,并在批评者的论据中戳破漏洞。当前的辩论主要围绕两个提案。全国专业工程师协会(NSPE)已发出呼吁,要求“独立”的“专业工程学校”(请参阅​​第54页的方框)。另一个是对两轨制的改变,该体系提供了四年制的通用工程学士学位或五年的面向实践的硕士学位,这可能是第一个专业学位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号