首页> 外文期刊>Social science computer review >Response Effects of Prenotification, Prepaid Cash, Prepaid Vouchers, and Postpaid Vouchers: An Experimental Comparison
【24h】

Response Effects of Prenotification, Prepaid Cash, Prepaid Vouchers, and Postpaid Vouchers: An Experimental Comparison

机译:预通知,预付现金,预付凭证和后付凭证的响应效果:实验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a web-based experiment with 1,750 randomly sampled university students, we investigated the effect of mailed prenotification plus prepaid cash, mailed prenotification plus a prepaid voucher, mailed prenotification plus a postpaid voucher, and mailed prenotification on its own as compared to a control group without prenotification or incentives. Dependent measures were response, retention, and item nonresponse. Mailed prenotification over no prenotification increased response and retention and decreased item nonresponse. Prenotification plus prepaid cash maximized response and retention. Item nonresponse was lowest with prenotification plus postpaid vouchers and second lowest with prenotification plus prepaid cash. In addition, we compared the cost for all experimental groups. Total costs were highest for prenotification plus prepaid cash, but costs per respondent or per retainee were highest in the control group. In sum, this experiment shows ways of improving participation in web surveys.
机译:在一个基于网络的实验中,随机抽取了1,750名大学生,我们调查了邮寄预通知加预付现金,邮寄预通知加预付凭证,邮寄预通知加后付凭证以及邮寄预通知与对照组相比的效果。没有预先通知或激励措施。相关措施包括响应,保留和项目无响应。邮寄的预先通知而不是没有预先通知会增加响应和保留并减少项目无响应。预通知加预付现金可最大程度地提高响应和保留率。带有预通知加后付费凭证的项目无响应最低,具有预通知加预付现金的第二最低。此外,我们比较了所有实验组的费用。预告加预付现金的总费用最高,但对照组中每个受访者或每个被保留者的费用最高。总而言之,该实验显示了改善网络调查参与度的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号