首页> 外文期刊>Social Choice and Welfare >Farsighted stability in hedonic games
【24h】

Farsighted stability in hedonic games

机译:享乐游戏中具有远见的稳定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigate how rational individuals partition themselves into different coalitions in hedonic games (see Banerjee et al. 2001 and Bogomolnaia and Jackson 2002), where individuals' preferences depend solely on the composition of the coalition they belong to. Given that the four solution concepts studied in the literature (core, Nash stability, individual stability and contractual individual stability) may exhibit myopia on the part of the players, we amend these notions by endowing players with foresight in that they look many steps ahead and consider only credible outcomes. We study the properties of the farsighted stability solutions; in particular, we show that when preferences are strict, coalition structures in the core are farsighted stable and a similar result also holds for Nash stability but not for individual stability and contractual individual stability. We thank Birgit Grodal, Hideo Konishi, an associate editor and two referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. Thanks also go to the audiences at University of Copenhagen, CSAET, 2001, Workshop on Coalitions and Networks at Warwick, 2001, and International Game Theory Conference at Stony Brook, 2001.
机译:我们研究了理性个体在享乐游戏中如何将自己划分为不同的联盟(参见Banerjee等人2001和Bogomolnaia and Jackson 2002),其中个体的偏好完全取决于他们所属联盟的组成。鉴于文献中研究的四个解决方案概念(核心,纳什稳定性,个体稳定性和契约个体稳定性)可能表现出部分玩家的近视,因此我们通过赋予玩家远见卓识来修正这些概念,因为它们展望了未来的许多步骤,并且仅考虑可靠的结果。我们研究具有远见的稳定性解的性质;特别是,我们表明,当偏好严格时,核心联盟结构是具有远见的稳定状态,类似的结果也适用于纳什稳定,但不适用于个人稳定性和契约式个人稳定性。感谢Birgit Grodal,副编辑Hideo Konishi和两位裁判的宝贵意见和建议。还要感谢2001年在CSAET的哥本哈根大学,在2001年在Warwick举行的联盟和网络研讨会以及在2001年在Stony Brook举行的国际博弈论会议上的观众。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号