首页> 外文期刊>Social Biology >Validation of Biomarkers of CVD Risk from Dried Blood Spots in Community-Based Research: Methodologies and Study-Specific Serum Equivalencies
【24h】

Validation of Biomarkers of CVD Risk from Dried Blood Spots in Community-Based Research: Methodologies and Study-Specific Serum Equivalencies

机译:社区研究中来自干血斑的CVD风险生物标志物的验证:方法和研究特定的血清等效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dried blood spot (DBS) methodology offers significant advantages over venipuncture in studies of vulnerable populations or large-scale studies, including reduced participant burden and higher response rates. Uncertainty about the validity of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk biomarkers remains a barrier to wide-scale use. We determined the validity of DBS-derived biomarkers of CVD risk versus gold-standard assessments, and study-specific, serum-equivalency values for clinical relevance of DBS-derived values. Concurrent venipuncture serum and DBS samples (n = 150 adults) were assayed in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified and DBS laboratories, respectively. Time controls of DBS standard samples were assayed single-blind along with test samples. Linear regression analyses evaluated DBS-to-serum equivalency values; agreement and bias were assessed via Bland-Altman plots. Linear regressions of venipuncture values on DBS-to-serum equivalencies provided R~2 values for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and C-reactive protein (CRP) of 0.484, 0.118, and 0.666, respectively. Bland-Altman plots revealed minimal systematic bias between DBS-to-serum and venipuncture values; precision worsened at higher mean values of CRP. Time controls revealed little degradation or change in analyte values for HDL-C and CRP over 30 weeks. We concluded that DBS-assessed biomarkers represent a valid alternative to venipuncture assessments. Large studies using DBS should include study-specific serum-equivalency determinations to optimize individual-level sensitivity, the viability of detecting intervention effects, and generalizability in community-level primary prevention interventions.
机译:在易感人群研究或大规模研究中,干血斑(DBS)方法比静脉穿刺术具有明显优势,包括减轻参与者负担和提高应答率。关于心血管疾病(CVD)风险生物标志物有效性的不确定性仍然是广泛使用的障碍。我们确定了DBS衍生的CVD风险生物标志物相对于金标准评估的有效性,以及针对DBS衍生值的临床相关性的研究特定血清等效值。并发静脉穿刺血清和DBS样本(150例成年人)分别在经临床实验室改进修正案认证和DBS实验室进行了测定。 DBS标准样品的时间对照与测试样品一起进行单盲测定。线性回归分析评估了DBS与血清的当量值;一致性和偏倚通过Bland-Altman图进行评估。静脉穿刺值对DBS-血清当量的线性回归提供的总胆固醇,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和C反应蛋白(CRP)的R〜2值分别为0.484、0.118和0.666。 Bland-Altman图显示DBS血清和静脉穿刺值之间的系统偏差最小。 CRP平均值越高,精度越差。时间控制显示,在30周内,HDL-C和CRP的分析物值几乎没有降解或变化。我们得出的结论是,星展银行评估的生物标志物是静脉穿刺评估的有效替代方案。使用DBS进行的大型研究应包括特定于研究的血清等效性测定,以优化个体水平的敏感性,检测干预效果的可行性以及社区一级一级预防干预措施的普遍性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Biology》 |2015年第3期|285-297|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;

    Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;

    Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA;

    Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, USA;

    Department of Epidemiology, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, USA, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA;

    Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA;

    CUNY School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY, USA;

    Department of Anthropology and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA;

    Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, USA, Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA,Department of Biobehavioral Health, 221 BBH Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号