首页> 外文期刊>Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on >Coordination of Distributed Energy Storage Under Spatial and Temporal Data Asymmetry
【24h】

Coordination of Distributed Energy Storage Under Spatial and Temporal Data Asymmetry

机译:时空数据不对称下的分布式储能协调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We consider the problem of controlling distributed storage in a network with renewable distributed generation to minimize operational cost while satisfying power quality constraints. We assume control is distributed between a global controller (GC) and local controllers (LCs) located at the nodes with storage units. Each LC has access to its most recent net load data and runs at every time step while the GC has delayed data due to smart meter infrastructure or communication network delay, hence runs less frequently. We describe three control schemes: 1) direct storage controller (DSC) in which the GC computes the storage control signals for an upcoming window and the LCs directly use these signals; 2) net load following controller (NLFC) in which the GC computes a net load profile for each node and each LC tries to track its set profile; and 3) nodal slack controller (NSC) in which the GC computes upper and lower bounds on the net load at each node and the LC optimizes the local control action constrained by these bounds. We use a radial network with real load data to compare the performance of these schemes based on arbitrage profit and maximum solar penetration relative to a perfect foresight controller. We find that NSC and NLFC increase the supported maximum solar penetration to 29% and 40%, respectively, as compared to 10% for DSC. Moreover, NSC is able to capture 90.7% of the available arbitrage profits which is significantly higher than that achievable with NLFC and DSC.
机译:我们考虑了在具有可再生分布式发电的网络中控制分布式存储的问题,以最大程度地降低运营成本,同时满足电能质量约束。我们假设控制在具有存储单元的节点上的全局控制器(GC)和本地控制器(LC)之间分配。每个LC都可以访问其最新的净负载数据,并在每个时间段运行,而GC由于智能电表基础设施或通信网络延迟而延迟了数据,因此运行频率降低。我们描述了三种控制方案:1)直接存储控制器(DSC),其中GC为即将到来的窗口计算存储控制信号,而LC直接使用这些信号; 2)净负载跟随控制器(NLFC),其中GC为每个节点计算净负载配置文件,并且每个LC尝试跟踪其设置的配置文件; 3)节点松弛控制器(NSC),其中GC计算每个节点上净负载的上限和下限,而LC优化受这些限制约束的本地控制动作。我们使用带有实际负荷数据的径向网络,根据套利和相对于理想的远见控制器的最大太阳穿透力,比较这些方案的性能。我们发现,与DSC相比,NSC和NLFC将支持的最大太阳能穿透率分别提高到29%和40%。此外,NSC能够获得90.7%的套利利润,远高于NLFC和DSC可获得的套利利润。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号