首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >A tool for cost-effectiveness analysis of field scale sediment-bound phosphorus mitigation measures and application to analysis of spatial and temporal targeting in the Lunan Water catchment, Scotland
【24h】

A tool for cost-effectiveness analysis of field scale sediment-bound phosphorus mitigation measures and application to analysis of spatial and temporal targeting in the Lunan Water catchment, Scotland

机译:成本效益分析工具,用于实地规模的沉积物约束磷缓解措施,并用于分析苏格兰鲁南集水区的时空目标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The cost-effectiveness of six edge-of-field measures for mitigating diffuse pollution from sediment bound phosphorus (P) runoff from temperate arable farmland is analysed at catchment/field scales. These measures were: buffer strips, permanent grassland in the lowest 1% of arable fields, dry detention bunds, wetlands, and temporary barriers such as sediment fences. Baseline field P export was estimated using export coefficients (low risk crops) or a modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (high risk crops). The impact of measures was estimated using simple equations. Costs were estimated from gross margin losses or local data on grants. We used a net cost:benefit (NCB) factor to normalise the costs and impacts of each measure over time. Costs minimisation for target impact was done using PuLP, a linear programming module for Python, across 1634 riparian and non-riparian fields in the Lunan Water, a mixed arable catchment in Eastern Scotland. With all measures in place, average cost-effectiveness increases from £9 to £48/kg P as target P mitigation increases from 500 to 2500 kg P across the catchment. Costs increase significantly when the measures available are restricted only to those currently eligible for government grants (buffers, bunds and wetlands). The assumed orientation of the average field slope makes a strong difference to the potential for storage of water by bunds and overall cost-effectiveness, but the non-funded measures can substitute for the extra expense incurred by bunds, where the slope orientation is not suitable. Economic discounting over time of impacts and costs of measures favours those measures, such as sediment fences, which are strongly targeted both spatially and temporally. This tool could be a useful guide for dialogue with land users about the potential fields to target for mitigation to achieve catchment targets.
机译:在集水区/田间尺度上,分析了六种减少边缘污染措施的成本效益,这些措施是减轻温带耕地的沉积物结合磷径流的扩散污染。这些措施包括:缓冲带,耕地中最低1%的永久性草地,干燥的障壁,湿地以及诸如隔离栅的临时屏障。使用出口系数(低风险作物)或改良的“世界土壤流失方程式”(高风险作物)估算基准田地P的出口量。使用简单的方程式估算措施的影响。成本是根据毛利损失或赠款的本地数据估算的。我们使用净成本:收益(NCB)因子对各个指标随时间推移的成本和影响进行归一化。通过使用PuLP(Python的线性编程模块),在位于苏格兰东部的一个混合耕种流域卢南水域的1634个河岸和非河岸领域中,将目标影响的成本降至最低。采取所有措施后,平均目标成本效益从9英镑/千克P增加到48英镑/千克,而目标P缓解措施从流域的500千克/千克增加到2500千克/千克。当可用的措施仅限于当前有资格获得政府补助的人员(缓冲区,外滩和湿地)时,成本会大大增加。假定的平均田间坡度定向与通过堤坝蓄水的潜力和总体成本效益有很大的差异,但是在坡度定向不适合的情况下,无资金支持的措施可以代替堤坝产生的额外费用。随着时间的流逝,经济影响和措施成本的折让有利于那些措施,例如沉积物围栏,这些措施在空间和时间上都是有针对性的。该工具可以作为与土地使用者进行对话的有用指南,以讨论潜在的减缓目标以实现集水目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号