...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Spatial and temporal variability in costs and effectiveness in phosphorus loss mitigation at farm scale: A scenario analysis
【24h】

Spatial and temporal variability in costs and effectiveness in phosphorus loss mitigation at farm scale: A scenario analysis

机译:农业规模磷损失减灾成本的空间和时间变异性:一种情况分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current policy instruments under the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) to mitigate phosphorus (P) loss require that P use on farms is managed through regulation of farm gate P balances. Regulation at farm scale does not account for spatial variability in nutrient use and soil fertility at field scale, affecting the costs and effectiveness of farm gate measures. This study simulated the implementation of a P loss mitigation measure coupled with improving soil fertility so that farm productivity would not be compromised. The measure was simulated at field scale and the costs and effectiveness assessed at farm scale. Effectiveness was expressed as the time taken for excessive soil P levels to decline to levels that matched off-takes and this varied temporally and spatially within and between farms ranging from 1 to 8 years. Sub-optimum soil fertility was corrected on all fields across both farms, with applications of other soil nutrients and lime to protect productivity. An increase in costs ranging from 1.5 to 116% was predicted in the first two years of the measure on both farms after-which savings of 15-31% were predicted for each subsequent year until the measure was effective in year 9. Despite initial cost increase, there was no statistically significant difference in costs over the time taken for the measure to be effective, when compared to baseline costs. Successful implementation of measures should consider the impact on farm costs and time taken for measures to environmentally effective. Adoption of measures could improve if demonstrating to farmers that costs will not vary significantly from current practice and in time may results in savings if measures are paired with correcting soil fertility and increasing yields. This 'win-win' approach could be used into the future to ensure successful implementation and uptake of measures within the farming community.
机译:欧盟水框架指令(WFD)下的目前的政策工具减轻了磷(P)损失要求通过对农场P P余额的规定来管理对农场的P使用。农业规模的规定不考虑现场规模营养利用和土壤肥力的空间变异,影响农场闸阀措施的成本和有效性。本研究模拟了P损伤减缓措施的实施,加上改善土壤肥力,从而不会损害农业生产力。该措施在现场规模和农业规模评估的成本和有效性。有效性被表达为过度土壤P水平下降到匹配的水平,匹配的水平,而且在1至8年的农场内和农场之间的时间和空间之间的时间变化。在两个农场的所有领域都纠正了次优的土壤肥力,具有其他土壤养分和石灰的应用,以保护生产率。在措施的前两年内预测了从1.5到116%的成本增加 - 在每年的每年储蓄为15-31%的节省,直到措施在第9次措施中的措施。尽管初始成本增加,与基线成本相比,措施有效的措施的时间没有统计学上显着差异。成功实施措施应考虑对环境有效的措施对农业成本和时间的影响。如果向农民向农民展示成本不会显着从目前的实践和及时差异,可能会提高措施可能会导致节省措施,如果措施与纠正土壤肥力和增加的产量增加。这种“双赢”方法可以用来将来,以确保成功实施和对农业社区中的措施的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号