...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Spatial and temporal variability in costs and effectiveness in phosphorus loss mitigation at farm scale: A scenario analysis
【24h】

Spatial and temporal variability in costs and effectiveness in phosphorus loss mitigation at farm scale: A scenario analysis

机译:农场规模减轻磷损失的成本和有效性的时空变化:情景分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current policy instruments under the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) to mitigate phosphorus (P) loss require that P use on farms is managed through regulation of farm gate P balances. Regulation at farm scale does not account for spatial variability in nutrient use and soil fertility at field scale, affecting the costs and effectiveness of farm gate measures. This study simulated the implementation of a P loss mitigation measure coupled with improving soil fertility so that farm productivity would not be compromised. The measure was simulated at field scale and the costs and effectiveness assessed at farm scale. Effectiveness was expressed as the time taken for excessive soil P levels to decline to levels that matched off-takes and this varied temporally and spatially within and between farms ranging from 1 to 8 years. Sub-optimum soil fertility was corrected on all fields across both farms, with applications of other soil nutrients and lime to protect productivity. An increase in costs ranging from 1.5 to 116% was predicted in the first two years of the measure on both farms after-which savings of 15-31% were predicted for each subsequent year until the measure was effective in year 9. Despite initial cost increase, there was no statistically significant difference in costs over the time taken for the measure to be effective, when compared to baseline costs. Successful implementation of measures should consider the impact on farm costs and time taken for measures to environmentally effective. Adoption of measures could improve if demonstrating to farmers that costs will not vary significantly from current practice and in time may results in savings if measures are paired with correcting soil fertility and increasing yields. This 'win-win' approach could be used into the future to ensure successful implementation and uptake of measures within the farming community.
机译:根据欧盟水框架指令(WFD)现行的减轻磷(P)损失的政策工具,要求通过调节农场大门的P平衡来管理农场中P的使用。农场规模的监管并未考虑到田间规模的养分使用和土壤肥力的空间差异,从而影响了农场大门措施的成本和有效性。这项研究模拟了减磷措施的实施以及土壤肥力的提高,从而不会损害农场的生产力。在实地规模上模拟该措施,并在农场规模上评估成本和有效性。有效性表示为过高的土壤磷水平下降至与承购量相匹配的水平所花费的时间,并且在农场内部和农场之间的时间和空间在1至8年之间变化。在两个农场的所有田地,均改良了次优土壤肥力,并应用了其他土壤养分和石灰以保护生产力。在该措施的前两年中,预计这两个农场的成本将增加1.5%到116%,此后,在该措施于第9年生效之前,预计每年将节省15-31%的费用。与基线成本相比,在有效期内所采取的措施成本在时间上没有统计学上的显着差异。措施的成功实施应考虑对农场成本的影响以及采取措施对环境有效的时间。如果向农民表明费用与目前的实践相差不大,则采取措施可以得到改善,如果将措施与纠正土壤肥力和提高产量结合起来,及时地可以节省成本。这种“双赢”方法可用于未来,以确保在农业社区内成功实施和采取措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号