首页> 外文期刊>Reading and Writing >Beyond spelling: the writing skills of students with dyslexia in higher education
【24h】

Beyond spelling: the writing skills of students with dyslexia in higher education

机译:超越拼写:阅读障碍学生在高等教育中的写作技巧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To have a clearer idea of the problems students with dyslexia may face during their studies, we compared writings of 100 students with dyslexia and 100 age matched control students in higher education. The aim of this study was to compare the writing of young adults with dyslexia and young adults without dyslexia. The study was carried out in Belgium with writers of Dutch. First, we studied the number and type of spelling errors, the quality of the texts produced, the use of words, and the handwriting, both in a précis writing task (writing a summary of an informative text) and in a dictation task (sentence writing). Our results showed medium to large effect sizes for spelling errors: d = 0.93 for morphosyntactic spelling errors, d = 0.55 for memory-related spelling errors, and a medium effect size for punctuation and capitalization errors, d = 0.40. Second, experts who were blind to the aims of the study were asked to judge the quality of the writing of both groups based on transcriptions that were free from spelling errors. The quality of the texts produced was judged lower for students with dyslexia than for the controls, d = 0.61 for text structure and d = 0.56 for agreeability, even though the number and types of words used by both groups were very much the same. There was no significant difference in the quality of the handwriting, d = 0.15. Given that remedial teaching has been shown to be effective for essay-writing skills, educational support along these lines may be helpful for students with dyslexia.
机译:为了更清晰地了解阅读障碍的学生在学习期间可能会遇到的问题,我们比较了100名患有阅读障碍的学生和100名年龄匹配的对照学生在高等教育中的著作。这项研究的目的是比较患有阅读障碍的年轻人和没有阅读障碍的年轻人的写作。这项研究是在比利时与荷兰作家一起进行的。首先,我们在早期写作任务(写出内容丰富的摘要)和听写任务(句子)中研究了拼写错误的数量和类型,产生的文本的质量,单词的使用和手写。写作)。我们的结果表明,拼写错误的影响大小为中到大:句法拼写错误的d = 0.93,与记忆相关的拼写错误的d = 0.55,标点和大写错误的中等影响大小为d = 0.40。其次,要求对研究目的不了解的专家根据没有拼写错误的转录来判断两组的写作质量。对于阅读障碍的学生来说,所得出的文本质量被认为比对照学生低,对于文本结构来说d = 0.61,对于一致性来说d = 0.56,尽管两组使用的单词的数量和类型几乎相同。笔迹质量没有显着差异,d = 0.15。鉴于已证明补习教学对论文写作技巧有效,因此,根据这些思路提供的教育支持可能会对阅读障碍的学生有所帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号