首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers >A comparison of three steering controllers for off-road vehicles
【24h】

A comparison of three steering controllers for off-road vehicles

机译:三种越野车转向控制器的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Many off-road vehicles use electrohydraulic (E/H) actuators for implementing steering controls. However, the high non-linearity of E/H steering systems often results in difficulties in achieving high performance in steering control, especially when it requires only some small steering corrections. Such features of E/H steering systems call for capable control methods to overcome the non-linearity problems in achieving a desirable level of steering performance. This paper presents a comparison of the performance of three commonly used controllers, namely a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller, a feedforward-plus-PID (FPID) controller, and a fuzzy controller, for an E/H steering system. To isolate environment influences on the investigation of the controller performance, the comparison tests were implemented on a validated hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) E/H steering system simulator. The results obtained confirmed that both the FPID and fuzzy controllers have superior performance in compensating for system deadband and could achieve more sensitive and accurate small steering corrections than a PID controller. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:许多越野汽车使用电动液压(E / H)执行器来实施转向控制。然而,E / H转向系统的高度非线性通常导致难以实现转向控制的高性能,尤其是在仅需要一些小的转向校正的情况下。 E / H转向系统的这些特征要求有能力的控制方法来克服非线性问题,以实现期望的转向性能水平。本文对E / H转向系统的三种常用控制器(即比例积分微分(PID)控制器,前馈加PID(FPID)控制器和模糊控制器)的性能进行了比较。为了隔离环境对控制器性能调查的影响,在经过验证的硬件在环(HIL)E / H转向系统模拟器上进行了比较测试。获得的结果证实,FPID和模糊控制器在补偿系统死区方面均具有出色的性能,并且与PID控制器相比,可以实现更灵敏和准确的小转向校正。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号