首页> 外文期刊>Printed Circuit Design >Flip-Chip vs. Wirebond
【24h】

Flip-Chip vs. Wirebond

机译:倒装芯片与引线键合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Tougher competition in existing wireless communication markets and emerging wireless applications that utilize a higher frequency spectrum are pushing hardware vendors to make more competitive products (such as the front-ends and the passive and active components). In the last few years, the need for high integration levels for RF and microwave applications have made the choice of interconnection solutions a very important issue, especially since the quality of these interconnects has a major impact on the performance and cost of the entire system. The need for better electrical performance―along with the cost reduction necessary for achieving the large growing potential of the wireless market―make vertical interconnections very promising. In recent years, both level-1 (chip-to-package) and level-2 (package-to-board) vertical interconnects have been considered. This article will summarize the advantages and the drawbacks of flip-chip vs. the widely used wirebond for microwave and millimeter-wave (mm-wave) applications, and how these affect the job of designers and engineers. As an alternative solution, ball grid array (BGA) packaging also will be addressed.
机译:现有无线通信市场中的激烈竞争以及利用更高频谱的新兴无线应用正在推动硬件供应商生产更具竞争力的产品(例如前端以及无源和有源组件)。在过去的几年中,RF和微波应用对高集成度的需求使互连解决方案的选择成为一个非常重要的问题,特别是因为这些互连的质量对整个系统的性能和成本产生了重大影响。对更好的电气性能的需求,以及为实现无线市场的巨大增长潜力所必需的降低成本的要求,使得垂直互连非常有前途。近年来,已经考虑了1级(芯片到封装)和2级(封装到板)垂直互连。本文将总结倒装芯片与广泛用于微波和毫米波(mm-wave)应用的引线键合的优缺点,以及它们如何影响设计人员和工程师的工作。作为替代解决方案,球栅阵列(BGA)封装也将得到解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号