首页> 外文期刊>Open house international >ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA: DESIGN RESEARCH AS A PLEA FOR ACADEMIC FREEDOM.
【24h】

ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA: DESIGN RESEARCH AS A PLEA FOR ACADEMIC FREEDOM.

机译:欧洲高等教育领域的建筑教育和质量保证:将设计研究作为学术自由的诉求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The authors reflect on the academic bachelor and master programs of architecture. From the perspective of higher education policy in Flanders, Belgium, they examine the intrinsic challenges of the academic educational setting, and the way architectural education can fit in and benefit from it, without losing its specific design oriented qualities. Therefore, they unravel the process of architectural design research, as a discipline-authentic way of knowledge production, leading to the identification of a number of implicit features of an academic architectural learning environment. The disquisition is based on educational arguments pointed out by literature and theory. Furthermore, the authors analyze whether this learning environment can comply with general standards of external quality assurance and accreditation systems. Doing so, they reveal the Achilles' heel of architectural education: the incompatibility of the design jury with formalized assessment frameworks. Finally, the authors conclude with an advocacy for academic freedom. To assure the quality of academic architectural programs, it is necessary that universities maintain a critical attitude towards standardized policy frameworks.
机译:作者回顾了建筑学的学士学位和硕士学位。从比利时法兰德斯的高等教育政策的角度,他们研究了学术教育环境的内在挑战,以及在不丧失其特定设计特色的前提下,建筑教育如何适应并从中受益。因此,他们解开了建筑设计研究的过程,将其作为一种学科认证的知识生产方式,从而导致对学术建筑学习环境的许多隐含特征的识别。该论述基于文学和理论所指出的教育论点。此外,作者分析了这种学习环境是否符合外部质量保证和认证系统的一般标准。这样做,他们揭示了建筑教育的致命弱点:设计评审团与正式的评估框架不兼容。最后,作者最后主张倡导学术自由。为了确保学术建筑计划的质量,大学必须对标准化政策框架持批判态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号