首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1204) “HARMONIZING QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGIES IN GEORGIA WITH STANDARDS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA (ENQA)'' -DISSEMINATION STRATEGY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF TEMPUS PROJECT
【24h】

(1204) “HARMONIZING QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGIES IN GEORGIA WITH STANDARDS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA (ENQA)'' -DISSEMINATION STRATEGY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF TEMPUS PROJECT

机译:(1204)“佐治亚州的欧洲高等教育区(ENQA)”框架项目框架的质量保证标准“协调品质保证策略

获取原文

摘要

The article deals with the findings of the gap analysis conducted by the institutions as the result of theworkpackage 2 in the framework of the TEMPUS project TNE_QA (Promoting Quality and Recognitionof Transnational Education in Armenia and Georgia). Synthetic self-evaluation of TEMPUS Projectpartner Universities was provided via gap analysis to harmonize the quality assurance strategies withthe standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ENQA).At first 7 domains were defined by the questionnaire:1 Policy and procedures for quality assurance;;2 Approval, monitoring and periodic review of programs and awards;;3 Assessment of students;;4 Quality assurance of teaching staff;;5 Learning resources and student support;;6 Information systems;;7 Public information.For each domain, the guidelines of ENQA & OECD/UNESCO were followed and a realistic and honestevaluation of the institution position was provided. The exercise was done from the point of internalquality assurance of HEIs.Gap analysis provided by the institutions showed whether 1. The institution was doing particularly wellregarding the criterion, the procedures existed and the evaluation results were good: no particularchange or improvement was needed;;2. The institution was performing average on the criteria: theprocedures existed and some results were satisfying, but there was still some room for improvement;;3. The institution performed poorly, either because the procedures were not yet operational orbecause the institution struggled to get acceptable results on the criterion;;4. The institution did not atall cover some aspects or all of the aspects of a criterion. The comments showing the reason of theexisting gap helped the institution better understand the concrete situation and present someevidence.The concrete findings helped the HEIs find the strength and weakness of their internal qualityassurance system and define the ways of improvement for implementing TNE.
机译:文章涉及的机构为theworkpackage 2在TEMPUS项目TNE_QA(推进素质和Recognitionof跨国教育在亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚)的框架内进行的结果差距分析的结果。 TEMPUS Projectpartner大学的综合自我评价通过缺口分析提供统一的质量保证策略的任意不等阶标准和准则在欧洲高等教育区质量保证(ENQA)。在第7个域通过问卷定义:1个政策和程序质量保证;; 2核准,监测和定期审查的程序和奖励;;学生3评估;;教学人员的4质量保证;; 5个学习资源和学生的支持;; 6个信息系统;; 7公共information.For每个域,ENQA&OECD / UNESCO准则随访和现实的,并提供该机构位置的honestevaluation。这次演习由显示机构的机构是否1.在做特别wellregarding标准提供HEIs.Gap分析internalquality保证的点完成,程序存在,评价结果为良好:在不需要particularchange或改善;; 2。该机构是在标准执行平均:theprocedures存在,一些结果满意,但仍有一定的提升空间; 3。该机构表现不佳,或者因为程序尚未运行orbecause机构挣扎着的准则; 4可接受的结果。该机构并没有atall涵盖某些方面或所有的标准的问题。显示theexisting差距的原因的评论帮助机构更好地了解具体情况和目前someevidence.The具体的评估结果帮助高校发现其内部品质保证系统的优势和劣势,并确定改进的方式实施TNE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号