...
【24h】

Book Reviews

机译:书评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Five years ago I was sure that Denmark would never legislate on smoking. Now the sensible or strict policy depending on perspective is a fact. Six years ago I was sure that research assessment exercises as we know it from UK would never have a chance to be introduced in Scandinavia. At the moment, all Scandinavian countries are working with similar schemes. The culture of assessment becomes more and more widespread. Some of the main points in the culture of assessment are, of course, concepts such as quality, user orientation, free choices and responsive public institutions. The approach to quality - whatever it is - has changed greatly in most sectors of society and it is now connected more to perceptions and satisfactions than it is to the values and norms of the profession. This culture of assessment has also permeated educational institutions and this is what the book under review is about. Many academics feel rather uneasy in this situation because professional standards are perceived to be undermined by management's emphasis on recruitment, retention of students and number of output. This uneasiness is strengthened by the observation that the influence of academics in matters traditionally considered pure research and teaching tend to decrease. This development was the main reason I looked forward to reviewing this book.
机译:五年前,我确信丹麦将永远不会立法禁止吸烟。现在,取决于观点的明智或严格的政策已成为事实。六年前,我确信,我们从英国了解到的研究评估活动永远不会有机会在斯堪的纳维亚半岛引入。目前,所有斯堪的纳维亚国家都在采用类似的计划。评估文化变得越来越普遍。当然,评估文化中的一些要点是诸如质量,用户导向,自由选择和反应迅速的公共机构之类的概念。不论质量如何,质量方法在社会的大多数领域都已发生了很大变化,如今与观念和满意度的联系已经更多,而与行业的价值观和规范无关。这种评估文化也渗透到教育机构中,这就是本书所要讨论的内容。在这种情况下,许多学者感到相当不自在,因为专业水平被管理层对招聘,留住学生和产出数量的强调所破坏。通过观察到学者在传统上被认为是纯粹的研究和教学的问题上的影响趋于减少的观点,加剧了这种不安。这种发展是我期待阅读本书的主要原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号