首页> 外文期刊>Neurocomputing >An analysis of smartphone overuse recognition in terms of emotions using brainwaves and deep learning
【24h】

An analysis of smartphone overuse recognition in terms of emotions using brainwaves and deep learning

机译:使用脑电波和深度学习从情绪方面分析智能手机过度使用识别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The overuse of smartphones is increasingly becoming a social problem. In this paper, we analyze smartphone overuse levels, according to emotion, by examining brainwaves and deep learning. We assessed the asymmetry power with respect to theta, alpha, beta, gamma, and total brainwave activity in 11 lobes. The deep belief network (DBN) was used as the deep learning method, along with k-nearest neighbor (kNN) and a support vector machine (SVM), to determine the smartphone addiction level. The risk group (13 subjects) and non-risk group (12 subjects) watched videos portraying the following concepts: relaxed, fear, joy, and sadness. We found that the risk group was more emotionally unstable than the non-risk group. In recognizing Fear, a clear difference appeared between the risk and non-risk group. The results showed that the gamma band was the most obviously different between the risk and non-risk groups. Moreover, we demonstrated that the measurements of activity in the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes were indicators of emotion recognition. Through the DBN, we confirmed that these measurements were more accurate in the non-risk group than they were in the risk group. The risk group had higher accuracy in low valence and arousal; on the other hand, the non-risk group had higher accuracy in high valence and arousal. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:智能手机的过度使用正日益成为一个社会问题。在本文中,我们通过检查脑电波和深度学习,根据情感来分析智能手机的过度使用水平。我们评估了关于11个瓣中theta,α,β,γ和总脑电波活动的不对称性。深度信念网络(DBN)与k最近邻(kNN)和支持向量机(SVM)一起用作深度学习方法,以确定智能手机的成瘾程度。风险组(13个受试者)和非风险组(12个受试者)观看了录像,这些录像描绘了以下概念:放松,恐惧,喜悦和悲伤。我们发现,与非风险组相比,风险组在情绪上更加不稳定。在识别恐惧时,风险组和非风险组之间存在明显差异。结果表明,高风险人群和非高风险人群之间的伽玛谱带最明显。此外,我们证明了额叶,顶叶和颞叶活动的测量是情绪识别的指标。通过DBN,我们确认非风险组中的这些测量比风险组中的更为准确。危险人群在低价和唤醒中的准确性较高;另一方面,非风险组在高价和唤醒中的准确性更高。 (c)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号