首页> 外文期刊>Marketing Science >Cross-Brand Pass-Through in Supermarket Pricing
【24h】

Cross-Brand Pass-Through in Supermarket Pricing

机译:超市定价中的跨品牌传递

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We investigate the sensitivity of cross-brand pass-through estimates to two types of pooling: across stores, and across regular price and promotional price weeks. Using the category data from Besanko, Dubé, and Gupta (2005), hereafter BDG, we find consistent support across all 11 categories for the predictive power of the wholesale prices of substitute products for retail shelf prices. A Bayesian procedure is used to address the small sample issues that arise in the absence of pooling. Even though the unpooled results render our inferences for specific cross-brand pass-through magnitudes reported in BDG as imprecise, consistent with McAlister (2007), we do find significant empirical support for cross-brand pass-through. nnWe next assess the sensitivity of cross-brand pass-through estimates to pooling. This requires us to construct a much longer time series of 224 weeks for the refrigerated orange juice category, in contrast with the 52-week samples used in BDG and McAlister (2007). We find strong empirical support for the predictive power of wholesale prices of substitute products for retail shelf prices. In addition, we find evidence of nonzero own- and cross-brand pass-through elasticities for which our inferences are much more precise. These findings are robust to the separation of regular and promotional price weeks. However, the magnitudes of own-brand and cross-brand pass-through are quite different during promotional and regular price weeks. Our results clearly show that with longer data series and more robust models that can handle small sample sizes, there is evidence of cross-brand pass-through, substantiating the findings in BDG. Finally, we comment on why our results are entirely consistent with both the theoretical and empirical literatures on category pricing and retailer behavior.
机译:我们调查跨品牌传递估算值对两种类型的汇总的敏感性:跨商店,跨常规价格周和促销价格周。使用Besanko,Dubé和Gupta(2005)(以下简称BDG)的类别数据,我们发现在所有11个类别中,对于替代产品的批发价格对零售货架价格的预测能力具有一致的支持。贝叶斯方法用于解决在没有合并的情况下出现的小样本问题。尽管未汇总的结果使我们对BDG中报告的特定跨品牌直通幅度的推断不精确,与McAlister(2007)一致,但我们确实发现了对跨品牌直通的重要经验支持。 nn接下来,我们评估跨品牌通过估算对合并的敏感性。与BDG和McAlister(2007)中使用的52周样本相比,这需要我们为冷藏橙汁类别构建更长的224周时间序列。我们发现,替代产品的批发价格对零售货架价格的预测能力具有强大的经验支持。另外,我们发现非零的自有品牌和跨品牌的直通弹性的证据,我们的推论更为精确。这些发现对于将常规价格周和促销价格周分开是有力的。但是,在促销周和正常价格周内,自有品牌和跨品牌传递的幅度有很大不同。我们的结果清楚地表明,使用更长的数据系列和更健壮的模型(可以处理小样本量),就有跨品牌传递的证据,这证明了BDG的发现。最后,我们评论为什么我们的结果与有关类别定价和零售商行为的理论和经验文献完全一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号