...
首页> 外文期刊>Lipids >Analysis of Fatty Acids in 12 Mediterranean Fish Species: Advantages and Limitations of a New GC-FID/GC–MS Based Technique
【24h】

Analysis of Fatty Acids in 12 Mediterranean Fish Species: Advantages and Limitations of a New GC-FID/GC–MS Based Technique

机译:分析12种地中海鱼类中的脂肪酸:基于GC-FID / GC-MS的新技术的优点和局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When fatty acids in fish are analyzed, results in percentage form (profile analysis) are mostly reported. However, the much more useful results expressed as mg/100 g (absolute analysis) is the main information required. Absolute methods based on calibration curves are of good accuracy but with a high degree of complexity if applied to a great number of analytes. Procedures based on the sequence profile analysis–total FA determination–absolute analysis may be suitable for routine use, but suffer from a number of uncertainties that have never been really resolved. These uncertainties are mainly related to the profile analysis. In fact, most profile analyses reported in the literature disagree about the number and type of fatty acids monitored as well as about the total percentage to assign to their sum so leading to possible inaccuracies; in addition the instrumental response factor for all FAME (fatty acid methyl esters) is often considered as a constant, but this is not exactly true. In this work, a set of 24 fatty acids was selected and studied on 12 fish species in the Mediterranean area (variable in lipid content and month of sampling): in our results, and in these species, this set constitutes, on average, 90 ± 3 % of the total fatty acid content. Moreover the error derived from the assumption of a unique response factor was investigated. Two different detection techniques (GC-FID and GC–MS) together with two capillary columns (different in length and polarity) were used in order to acquire complementary data on the same sample. With the protocol here proposed absolute analyses on the 12 cited species are easily achievable by the total FA determination procedure. The accuracy of this approach is good in general, but in some cases (DHA for example) is lower than the accuracy of calibration-based methods. The differences were evaluated on a case by case basis.
机译:在分析鱼中的脂肪酸时,通常会报告百分比形式的结果(轮廓分析)。但是,以mg / 100 g(绝对分析)表示的更有用的结果是所需的主要信息。基于校准曲线的绝对方法具有较高的准确性,但如果将其应用于大量分析物,则具有很高的复杂度。基于序列概况分析-总FA测定-绝对分析的方法可能适合常规使用,但存在许多不确定性,这些不确定性尚未真正解决。这些不确定性主要与配置文件分析有关。实际上,文献中报告的大多数概况分析在监测的脂肪酸的数量和类型以及分配给脂肪酸总和的总百分比上都存在分歧,因此可能导致误差。此外,所有FAME(脂肪酸甲酯)的仪器响应因子通常被认为是一个常数,但这并非完全正确。在这项工作中,选择了24种脂肪酸,并对地中海地区的12种鱼类进行了研究(脂质含量和采样月份不同):在我们的结果中,在这些物种中,平均构成90种脂肪酸总脂肪酸含量的±3%。此外,研究了由唯一响应因子的假设得出的误差。为了获得同一样品的互补数据,使用了两种不同的检测技术(GC-FID和GC-MS)以及两个毛细管柱(长度和极性不同)。通过本文提出的方案,可以通过总FA测定程序轻松地对12种被引物种进行绝对分析。通常,此方法的准确性较高,但在某些情况下(例如DHA)低于基于校准的方法的准确性。逐案评估差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号