首页> 外文期刊>Journal of urban affairs >Privately owned parks in New Urbanist communities: A study of environmental privilege, equity, and inclusion
【24h】

Privately owned parks in New Urbanist communities: A study of environmental privilege, equity, and inclusion

机译:新都市主义者社区中的私人公园:环境特权,公平和包容性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Privately owned parks and public spaces (POPS) are increasingly common in New Urbanist (NU) communities. POPS raise concerns related to environmental privilege, equity, and inclusion; however, no investigation has fully analyzed whether POPS in NU communities cause these same concerns. This is particularly problematic because of NU's recognition as a sustainable planning paradigm and because NU proponents seek to establish mixed-income and ethnically diverse communities. Thus, this study examines how these 3 concerns about POPS play out in NU developments. In addition, it analyzes how municipal policies and real estate processes contribute to establishing POPS in NU communities. We find that concerns about environmental privilege, equity, and inclusion are well founded, and that reliance on POPS provides significant advantages for developers, residents, and municipalities alike, mostly because of cost savings and notions of exclusivity.
机译:私人公园和公共场所(POPS)在新城市主义者(NU)社区中越来越普遍。 POPS引起了与环境特权,公平和包容性有关的担忧;但是,没有调查充分分析NU社区中的POPS是否引起这些相同的问题。这尤其成问题,因为NU被公认为可持续计划范本,并且因为NU的拥护者寻求建立混合收入和不同种族的社区。因此,本研究探讨了关于POPS的这3个问题在NU开发中如何发挥作用。此外,它分析了市政政策和房地产流程如何有助于在NU社区建立POPS。我们发现,对环境特权,公平性和包容性的担心是有充分根据的,并且依赖POPS可以为开发商,居民和市政当局提供显着的优势,这主要是因为节省了成本并具有排他性的概念。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of urban affairs》 |2018年第4期|543-559|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Calif State Univ Northridge, Northridge, CA 91330 USA;

    Univ Colorado Denver, Planning & Design, Denver, CO USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号