...
首页> 外文期刊>Housing studies >'They Seem to Divide Us': Social Mix and Inclusion in Two Traditional Urbanist Communities
【24h】

'They Seem to Divide Us': Social Mix and Inclusion in Two Traditional Urbanist Communities

机译:“他们似乎将我们分开”:两个传统都市主义社区的社会融合与融合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Mixed tenure communities have become an important element of UK housing policy in recent decades. Whilst valued by policy-makers for generating a range of benefits, particularly for residents living in social rented housing, the empirical literature suggests that tenure mixing is neither a sufficient nor a reliable remedy for addressing issues associated with concentrations of poverty, disadvantage and social exclusion. This paper reports on a doctoral research study that considered tenure mixing practices at two traditional urbanist communities in the UK: Poundbury, Dorchester, and New Gorbals, Glasgow. Conceptually, the paper uses Young's critiques of residential segregation and the integration ideal to evaluate the two communities. Methodologically, it draws on qualitative interviews with residents, planners and social housing providers. The research findings contradict many aspects of Young's ideal and highlight the complex and multidimensional nature of integration in practice. Reflecting on these findings, the paper identifies five housing policy and research priorities that might usefully be pursued in future work.
机译:近几十年来,混合保有权社区已成为英国住房政策的重要组成部分。尽管政策制定者认为,权能混合既不能产生充分的收益,也不能为解决与贫困,弱势和社会排斥现象相关的问题提供充分的补救办法,但政策制定者认为这尤其是为居住在社会出租住房中的居民带来了一系列好处。 。本文报道了一项博士研究研究,该研究考虑了英国两个传统的城市主义社区的权属混合做法:多切斯特的庞德伯里和格拉斯哥的新戈尔巴尔斯。从概念上讲,本文使用了扬的住宅隔离评论和整合理想来评估两个社区。从方法上讲,它采用了对居民,规划者和社会住房提供者的定性访谈。研究发现与杨氏理想的许多方面相矛盾,并突出了实践中整合的复杂性和多维性。通过对这些发现的反思,本文确定了五项住房政策和研究重点,可以在未来的工作中加以有益地运用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号