首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets >Mach 6 Wake Flow Simulations Using a Large-Eddy Simulation/Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Model
【24h】

Mach 6 Wake Flow Simulations Using a Large-Eddy Simulation/Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Model

机译:使用大涡模拟/雷诺平均Navier-Stokes模型进行的6马赫尾流模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A hybrid large-eddy simulation/Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence model is used to simulate the Mach 6 flow around a scaled model similar to NASA's Orion multipurpose crew vehicle. The results for surface pressure and heat transfer are compared with experimental data from previous base flow experiments conducted at the Calspan -University at Buffalo Research Center. Using the highest Reynolds number test case (11 × 10~6 based on capsule diameter), different numerical aspects of the hybrid approach are addressed, such as use of a low-dissipation scheme, a modification to the eddy-viscosity blending function, time-averaging results, filtering computational results, and sensitivity to grid resolution. In addition, results are compared with Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes using Mentor's two-equation baseline model and to detached-eddy simulation predictions. By introducing a new modification to the blending from Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes to large-eddy simulation within boundary layers, very good agreement with the experiment is obtained in regions where the boundary-layer grid spacing is too coarse for large-eddy simulation. The findings show that the high-fidelity schemes produce results that agree much better with the experimental data than Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes methods, which tend to underpredict base pressures and overpredict heat fluxes. The overall accuracy of each scheme is evaluated using a normalized root mean square error in different regions of the flow, and the analysis shows that, in separated regions, the integrated error is over 120% using a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes model, and 30-50% using the higher fidelity schemes. Additionally, the hybrid methodology presented is further validated by considering a lower Reynolds number (6 × 10~6), where the flow is nominally transitional, and very accurate heat transfer predictions are also obtained.
机译:混合大涡模拟/雷诺平均的Navier-Stokes湍流模型用于模拟类似于NASA的Orion多用途乘员车的比例模型周围的6马赫流。将表面压力和传热的结果与之前在布法罗研究中心卡尔斯潘大学进行的基础流量实验的实验数据进行了比较。使用最高的雷诺数测试用例(基于胶囊直径11×10〜6),解决了混合方法的不同数值方面,例如使用低耗散方案,对涡流-粘度混合函数,时间的修改平均结果,过滤计算结果以及对网格分辨率的敏感性。此外,使用Mentor的两方程基线模型将结果与雷诺平均Navier-Stokes进行比较,并与分离涡模拟预测进行比较。通过对边界层内的从雷诺平均Navier-Stokes到大涡流模拟的混合进行新的修改,在边界层网格间距对于大涡流模拟而言过于粗糙的区域中获得了与实验的很好的一致性。研究结果表明,高保真方案产生的结果与雷诺平均的Navier-Stokes方法相比,与实验数据更好地吻合,后者倾向于低估基本压力,而高估热通量。使用归一化均方根误差在流的不同区域中评估每种方案的整体准确性,分析表明,使用雷诺平均Navier-Stokes模型,在分离的区域中,积分误差超过120%,并且使用较高保真度方案的费用占30-50%。此外,考虑到较低的雷诺数(6×10〜6),可以进一步验证所提出的混合方法,该处的流动名义上是过渡的,并且还可以获得非常准确的传热预测。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets》 |2014年第4期|1329-1348|共20页
  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695;

    North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号