首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Service Research >Service Failure Severity, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Share: An Examination of the Airline Industry
【24h】

Service Failure Severity, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Share: An Examination of the Airline Industry

机译:服务失败的严重程度,客户满意度和市场份额:对航空业的考察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The generally accepted view among managers and researchers is that the greater the severity of a service failure, the greater the resulting impact on customer satisfaction and business outcomes, such as lost customers and revenue. The research used to defend this viewpoint, however, does not typically address the severity of service failures, like those that result in injury or death (i.e., product-harm crises). This research addresses this issue by examining both minor incidents (i.e., failures that do not result in physical harm) and major incidents (i.e., failures that result in injury or death) in the U.S. airline industry, and the corresponding impact on the customer satisfaction and market share of the firms affected. Our results indicate that minor incidents are more strongly (negatively) related to future market share than are major incidents. Moreover, our findings indicate that only minor incidents are significantly linked to customer satisfaction. We argue that these findings occur for two reasons: First, most customers believe major incidents to be low probability events that are less salient when compared to more probable failures. Second, consumers impacted by major incidents most likely defect and are therefore not captured in future customer satisfaction surveys. Consequently, managers can delude themselves that things have "returned to normal" after a major incident when relying on customer satisfaction scores alone.
机译:管理人员和研究人员普遍接受的观点是,服务故障的严重性越大,对客户满意度和业务成果(如客户流失和收入)的影响越大。但是,用于捍卫这种观点的研究通常没有解决服务失败的严重性,例如导致伤害或死亡(即产品损害危机)的服务失败。本研究通过检查美国航空业的次要事件(即未造成人身伤害的故障)和重大事件(即未导致人身伤害的故障)以及对客户满意度的相应影响,来解决此问题。和受影响公司的市场份额。我们的结果表明,与大事件相比,小事件与未来市场份额的关系更大(负)。此外,我们的发现表明,只有很小的事件与客户满意度显着相关。我们认为出现这些发现的原因有两个:首先,大多数客户认为重大事件属于低概率事件,与可能发生的故障相比,这种事件的重要性较低。其次,受重大事件影响的消费者最有可能出现缺陷,因此不会在未来的客户满意度调查中被发现。因此,经理仅凭客户满意度得分就可以自欺欺人,认为重大事件发生后事情已经“恢复正常”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号