...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research in science teaching >Identifying a Core Set of Science Teaching Practices: A Delphi Expert Panel Approach
【24h】

Identifying a Core Set of Science Teaching Practices: A Delphi Expert Panel Approach

机译:确定一套核心的科学教学实践:Delphi专家小组方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Framework for K-12 Science Education details ambitious goals for students' learning of science content and practices. However, this document provides science teachers little guidance about instructional practices that are central to helping students achieve these goals. Research indicates that a teacher's instructional practice can impact student interest and achievement more than advanced degrees or teaching experience and thus, identifying a core set of science teaching practices may be one key to improving science education. Based on a practice-based theory of teaching, this study used a panel of expert science teachers and university faculty to identify a set of core science teaching practices. The Delphi methodology used in this study engaged the expert panel in three anonymous and iterative rounds of voting and justification of science teaching practices. Nine of the fifty-one suggested practices met the pre-determined consensus criteria. Three major themes emerged from the results. First, a majority of practices, like "Engaging Students in Investigations" and "Facilitating Classroom Discourse," promote an interactive and dialogic science classroom. Second, the discussion among panel members across the three rounds indicates the need to develop a more common language and understanding of science teaching practice. Third, the panel highlighted the important role that on-going assessment plays in science teaching with practices like "Eliciting, Using, and Assessing Student Thinking about Science" and "Providing Feedback." This study lays the groundwork for the further decomposition of these core teaching practices and provides the foundation for further empirical research on how these practices are learned and executed by teachers, and their impact on student learning.
机译:K-12科学教育框架详细说明了学生学习科学内容和实践的宏伟目标。但是,本文档为理科教师提供了关于指导实践的指导,而指导实践对于帮助学生实现这些目标至关重要。研究表明,教师的教学实践对学生的兴趣和成就的影响比高级学位或教学经验更为重要,因此,确定一套核心的科学教学实践可能是改善科学教育的关键。基于基于实践的教学理论,本研究使用专家科学教师小组和大学教师来确定一组核心科学教学实践。本研究中使用的德尔菲方法论使专家小组参与了三轮匿名和反复的投票和科学教学实践的论证。建议的51种实践中有9种符合预定的共识标准。结果显示出三个主要主题。首先,大多数做法,例如“吸引学生参加调查”和“促进课堂话语”,都可以促进交互式和对话式科学教室。其次,三个回合的小组成员之间的讨论表明,有必要发展一种更加通用的语言并理解科学教学实践。第三,小组成员强调了进行中的评估在科学教学中的重要作用,这些实践包括“激发,使用和评估学生对科学的思考”和“提供反馈”。这项研究为进一步分解这些核心教学实践奠定了基础,并为进一步的实证研究奠定了基础,这些研究是关于教师如何学习和执行这些实践及其对学生学习的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号