...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of research administration >A Qualitative Case Study Exploring the Nature of New Managerialism in UK Higher Education and Its Impact on Individual Academics' Experience of Doing Research
【24h】

A Qualitative Case Study Exploring the Nature of New Managerialism in UK Higher Education and Its Impact on Individual Academics' Experience of Doing Research

机译:定性案例研究,探索英国高等教育新管理主义的性质及其对个别学者的研究经验的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

New Managerialism (NM) has been used as an analytical framework to help understand the changes within the UK Higher Education Sector. This project sought to extend that work by undertaking a case study of an English university. Using the theory of NM, the study combined organisational description, strategic document review and in-depth interviews to qualitatively explore the extent to which research management practices could be considered New Managerialist and their impact on individuals' experiences of doing research. This project discovered that management practices could be characterised by a hybridised version of NM. Impact on individuals related to key themes: research funding; performance measurement; academic freedom and control; fragmented organisation and mixed messages; research culture. It was found that individuals consciously engaged in 'informal' strategies to pursue their own research agendas within formal' management frameworks. An implementation gap between strategic plans and operational practices created space for individual autonomy, but led to tensions arising from conflicting values at the level of the organisation, department and individual. It was suggested that further investigation could lead to greater insight into how researchers make sense of their role and work environment and, from a management perspective, how best to motivate and support research work.
机译:新管理主义(NM)已被用作分析框架,以帮助了解英国高等教育领域的变化。该项目试图通过对一所英国大学进行案例研究来扩展这项工作。该研究使用NM理论,结合组织描述,战略文件审查和深入访谈,定性地探讨了研究管理实践可被视为新管理者的程度及其对个人研究经历的影响。该项目发现管理实践可以以NM的混合版本为特征。对与关键主题有关的个人的影响:研究经费;绩效评估;学术自由和控制;零散的组织和混合的消息;研究文化。结果发现,个人有意识地参与了“非正式”策略,以在正式的“管理”框架内追求自己的研究议程。战略计划与运营实践之间的实施差距为个人自治创造了空间,但导致了组织,部门和个人层面相互矛盾的价值观所引起的紧张关系。有人建议,进一步的调查可能会导致对研究人员如何理解其角色和工作环境以及从管理的角度如何更好地激发和支持研究工作有更深入的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号