首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Performance comparison of the BioSys optical assay and the violet red bile agar method for detecting coliforms in food products.
【24h】

Performance comparison of the BioSys optical assay and the violet red bile agar method for detecting coliforms in food products.

机译:BioSys光学检测法和紫红色胆琼脂法检测食品中大肠菌群的性能比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Coliform counts in a variety of foods, including dairy products (raw milk, pasteurized milk, yogurt, butter, and ice cream), meats (pork sausage, ground beef, and raw chicken), raw eggs, and chocolate, were performed by the rapid automated BioSys optical assay and the conventional method with violet red bile agar (VRBA). The standard deviation (SD) among five replicate counts for the optical assay was similar to or better than that obtained with VRBA plates for all foods tested. The average SD for all foods tested was 0.21 for the optical assay and 0.30 for the VRBA plates. At very low concentrations of coliforms (1 to 10 CFU/ml for liquid products and 10 to 100 CFU/g for solid samples), the average SDs were 0.26 and 0.47, respectively. The optical assay was less susceptible to interference by noncoliform organisms. In naturally contaminated samples, bacteria such as Serratia liquefaciens, Pantoea spp., Vibrio fluvialis, Aeromonas hydrophilia, and Pseudomonas spp. formed typical colonies in VRBA, resulting in false-positive results or a need to verify colonies in brilliant green lactose broth. The optical assay appeared to be more selective than the VRBA conventional method, detecting fewer noncoliforms. There was close agreement in test results between the two methods, as indicated by correlation coefficients of 0.92 to 0.99 obtained for the regression analysis of the two methods. In most cases both methods distinguished accurately between positive samples containing coliforms and negative controls. All products tested using the automated BioSys Optical Assay for coliforms yielded results more quickly (typically 10 to 12 h) than did those tested with the conventional VRBA method (24 to 72 h with confirmation).
机译:大肠菌群计数包括乳制品(生奶,巴氏杀菌奶,酸奶,黄油和冰淇淋),肉类(猪肉香肠,牛肉末和生鸡肉),生鸡蛋和巧克力,包括快速自动化的BioSys光学测定和使用紫红色胆汁琼脂(VRBA)的常规方法。光学测定的五个重复计数中的标准偏差(SD)与所有测试食品的VRBA板相似或更好。光学检测的所有测试食品的平均SD为0.21,VRBA平板的平均SD为0.30。在非常低的大肠菌浓度下(液体产品为1至10 CFU / ml,固体样品为10至100 CFU / g),平均SD分别为0.26和0.47。光学测定对非大肠菌生物的干扰较不敏感。在自然污染的样品中,细菌包括液化沙雷氏菌,泛菌属,河流弧菌,亲水气单胞菌和假单胞菌。在VRBA中形成典型的菌落,导致假阳性结果或需要验证亮绿色乳糖肉汤中的菌落。光学检测似乎比VRBA常规方法更具选择性,可检测到较少的非大肠菌。两种方法之间的测试结果非常一致,这两种方法的回归分析相关系数为0.92至0.99。在大多数情况下,两种方法都能准确地区分含有大肠菌的阳性样品和阴性对照。使用自动BioSys光学检测法检测大肠菌群的所有产品,其结果(通常为10至12小时)比使用常规VRBA方法检测的结果(确认为24至72小时)更快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号