首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Detection, Isolation, and Incidence of Listeria spp. in Small-Scale Artisan Cheese Processing Facilities: A Methods Comparison
【24h】

Detection, Isolation, and Incidence of Listeria spp. in Small-Scale Artisan Cheese Processing Facilities: A Methods Comparison

机译:李斯特菌的检测,分离和发病率。小型工匠奶酪加工设施中的应用:方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Environmental sampling, focused on environmental sites with a high probability of contamination, was conducted in eight artisan cheese processing facilities. Samples (n = 236) from 86 food contact surfaces and 150 non-food contact surfaces were examined for the presence of Listeria spp. by comparing the efficacy of three different primary enrichment media used in five detection and isolation methods. University of Vermont broth was the most sensitive primary enrichment medium for the detection of Listeria spp., including Listeria monocytogenes. These results, however, did not differ significantly from those obtained with Listeria repair broth or Oxoid 24 Listeria enrichment broth. When full methods were considered, the use of dual enrichment methods identified the most Listeria spp.-positive samples, whereas the BAX System PCR Assay for the Genus Listeria 24E provided the most rapid results (~30 h). Cultural results from the direct plating of secondary enrichment broths were generally in agreement with PCR results when compared within methods. Despite minor differences in efficacy, all five methods were in agreement with one another. Overall, 24 (10.7%) of the 236 environmental samples were positive for Listeria spp., all of which were collected from non-food contact surfaces. Nine of these sites were also positive in previous sampling events, suggesting that these sites serve as Listeria niches and that certain ribotypes are particularly persistent, inhabiting environments and specific sites for over 2 years. Overall, our results suggest that the extent of Listeria spp. contamination, notably L. monocytogenes, in small-scale artisan cheese processing environments is low.
机译:在八个手工奶酪加工设施中进行了环境采样,重点是污染可能性高的环境地点。检查了来自86个食品接触表面和150个非食品接触表面的样本(n = 236)是否存在李斯特菌。通过比较三种检测和分离方法中使用的三种不同的主要富集培养基的功效。佛蒙特大学肉汤是检测李斯特菌属物种(包括单核细胞增生李斯特菌)的最灵敏的主要富集培养基。但是,这些结果与利斯特氏菌修复肉汤或Oxoid 24李斯特氏菌富集肉汤获得的结果没有显着差异。当考虑全部方法时,使用双重富集方法可鉴定出最多的李斯特菌属菌种阳性样品,而针对李斯特菌属24E的BAX系统PCR检测提供了最快的结果(约30小时)。在方法中进行比较时,直接接种次级富集肉汤的培养结果通常与PCR结果一致。尽管功效略有不同,但所有五种方法都相互一致。总体而言,在236个环境样品中,有24个(10.7%)的李斯特菌属呈阳性,所有这些样品都是从非食品接触表面收集的。这些地点中有9个在以前的采样事件中也呈阳性,这表明这些地点可作为利斯特氏菌ni,某些核糖型特别持久,居住环境和特定地点已超过2年。总的来说,我们的结果表明李斯特菌属的程度。小型工匠奶酪加工环境中的污染(尤其是单核细胞增生李斯特菌)污染较低。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2009年第12期|2499-2507|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 109 Carrigan Drive, 361 Joseph Carrigan Wing, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405, USA;

    Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 109 Carrigan Drive, 361 Joseph Carrigan Wing, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:26:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号