首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method for Detecting Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Beef and Comparison to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook Method
【24h】

Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method for Detecting Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Beef and Comparison to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook Method

机译:用于检测牛肉中产生志贺毒素的大肠杆菌的多重实时PCR方法的评估以及与美国农业部食品安全和检验服务微生物学实验室指南方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The "top-six" non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145) most frequently associated with outbreaks and cases of foodborne illnesses have been declared as adulterants in beef by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Regulatory testing in beef began in June 2012. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the DuPont BAX System method for detecting these top six STEC strains and strains of E. coli O157∶H7. For STEC, the BAX System real-time STEC suite was evaluated, including a screening assay for the stx and eae virulence genes and two panel assays to identify the target serogroups: panel 1 detects O26, O111, and O121, and panel 2 detects O45, O103, O145. For E. coli O157∶H7, the BAX System real-time PCR assay for this specific serotype was used. Sensitivity of each assay for the PCR targets was ≥ 1.23 × 10~3 CFU/ml in pure culture. Each assay was 100% inclusive for the strains tested (20 to 50 per assay), and no cross-reactivity with closely related strains was observed in any of the assays. The performance of the BAX System methods was compared with that of the FSIS Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) methods for detection of the top six STEC and E. coli O157∶H7 strains in ground beef and beef trim. Generally, results of the BAX System method were similar to those of the MLG methods for detecting non-O157 STEC and E. coli O157∶H7. Reducing or eliminating novobiocin in modified tryptic soy broth (mTSB) may improve the detection of STEC O111 strains; one beef trim sample inoculated with STEC O111 produced a negative result when enriched in mTSB with 8 mg/liter novobiocin but was positive when enriched in mTSB without novobiocin. The results of this study indicate the feasibility of deploying a panel of real-time PCR assay configurations for the detection and monitoring of the top six STEC and E. coli O157∶H7 strains in beef. The approach could easily be adapted for additional multiplex assays should regulations expand to include other O serogroups or virulence genes.
机译:牛肉中最常与疾病爆发和食源性疾病病例相关的“前六种”非O157志贺毒素生产性大肠杆菌(STEC)血清群(O26,O45,O103,O111,O121和O145)被视为掺假由美国农业部食品安全与检验服务局(FSIS)提供。牛肉的法规测试始于2012年6月。本研究的目的是评估杜邦BAX系统方法,以检测这六种最重要的STEC菌株和O157∶H7大肠杆菌菌株。对于STEC,评估了BAX系统实时STEC套件,包括对stx和eae毒力基因的筛选测定以及两种用于鉴定目标血清群的检测:第一组检测O26,O111和O121,第二组检测O45。 ,O103,O145。对于O157∶H7大肠杆菌,使用针对该特定血清型的BAX系统实时PCR分析。在纯培养物中,每种测定对PCR靶标的敏感性均≥1.23×10〜3 CFU / ml。对于所测试的菌株,每个测定均为100%包含在内(每个测定20至50个),并且在任何测定中均未观察到与紧密相关菌株的交叉反应。将BAX系统方法的性能与FSIS微生物实验室指南(MLG)方法的性能进行了比较,该方法可检测出碎牛肉和牛肉条中排名前六的STEC和大肠杆菌O157∶H7菌株。通常,BAX系统方法的结果类似于检测非O157 STEC和大肠杆菌O157∶H7的MLG方法的结果。减少或消除改良的胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤(mTSB)中的新生霉素可以改善STEC O111菌株的检测;一份接种STEC O111的牛肉修剪样品在富含8 mg / L新霉素的mTSB中富集时产生阴性结果,而在不含新霉素的mTSB中富集时呈阳性结果。这项研究的结果表明,部署一组实时PCR分析配置来检测和监测牛肉中排名前六位的STEC和大肠杆菌O157∶H7菌株的可行性。如果法规扩展到包括其他O血清群或毒力基因,该方法很容易适用于其他多重分析。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2014年第2期|180-188|共9页
  • 作者单位

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038;

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038,U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Richard Russell Research Center, Athens, Georgia 30605,U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Eastern Laboratory Outbreaks Section, Athens, GA 30605, USA;

    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038;

    DuPont Nutrition & Health, DuPont Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19880, USA;

    DuPont Nutrition & Health, DuPont Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19880, USA;

    DuPont Nutrition & Health, DuPont Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19880, USA;

    DuPont Nutrition & Health, DuPont Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19880, USA;

    DuPont Nutrition & Health, DuPont Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware 19880, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号