首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Assessment of Listeria sp. Interference Using a Molecular Assay To Detect Listeria monocytogenes in Food
【24h】

Assessment of Listeria sp. Interference Using a Molecular Assay To Detect Listeria monocytogenes in Food

机译:李斯特菌属的评估使用分子检测技术检测食品中单核细胞增生李斯特菌的干扰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food is currently based on enrichment methods. When L. monocytogenes is present with other Listeria species in food, the species compete during the enrichment process. Overgrowth competition of the nonpathogenic Listeria species might result in false-negative results obtained with the current reference methods. This potential issue was noted when 50 food samples artificially spiked with L. monocytogenes were tested with a real-time PCR assay and Canada's current reference method, MFHPB-30. Eleven of the samples studied were from foods naturally contaminated with Listeria species other than those used for spiking. The real-time PCR assay detected L. monocytogenes in all 11 of these samples; however, only 6 of these samples were positive by the MFHPB-30 method. To determine whether L. monocytogenes detection can be affected by other species of the same genus due to competition, an L. monocytogenes strain and a Listeria innocua strain with a faster rate of growth in the enrichment broth were artificially coinoculated at different ratios into ground pork meat samples and cultured according to the MFHPB-30 method. L. monocytogenes was detected only by the MFHPB-30 method when L. monocytogenes/L. innocua ratios were 6.0 or higher. In contrast, using the same enrichments, the real-time PCR assay detected L. monocytogenes at ratios as low as 0.6. Taken together, these findings support the hypothesis that L. monocytogenes can be outcompeted by L. innocua during the MFHPB-30 enrichment phase. However, more reliable detection of L. monocytogenes in this situation can be achieved by a PCR-based method mainly because of its sensitivity.
机译:食品中单核细胞增生李斯特菌的检测目前基于富集方法。当食品中存在其他单核细胞增生李斯特菌与其他李斯特菌时,该物种会在富集过程中竞争。非致病性李斯特菌物种的过度竞争可能导致使用当前参考方法获得假阴性结果。当使用实时PCR测定法和加拿大当前的参考方法MFHPB-30对50个人工添加了单核细胞增生李斯特菌的食品样品进行测试时,注意到了这一潜在问题。所研究的样品中有11个来自天然的,被李斯特菌物种污染的食物,而不是用于加标的食物。实时荧光定量PCR检测法在所有这11个样品中检测到了单核细胞增生李斯特菌。但是,通过MFHPB-30方法,这些样品中只有6个呈阳性。为了确定单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌的检测是否可能由于竞争而受到同一属的其他物种的影响,将富集肉汤中生长较快的单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌菌株和无毒李斯特菌菌株以不同比例人工共接种到猪肉中肉样品,并根据MFHPB-30方法进行培养。当单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌/ L时,仅通过MFHPB-30方法检测到单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌。无创比率为6.0或更高。相比之下,使用相同的富集,实时PCR分析检测到单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌的比率低至0.6。综上所述,这些发现支持了以下假说:在MFHPB-30富集阶段,单核细胞增生李斯特菌可以被无病菌击败。但是,在这种情况下,通过基于PCR的方法可以更可靠地检测单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌,主要是因为其灵敏度高。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of food protection》 |2016年第1期|138-143|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1M1;

    Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1M1;

    Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1M1;

    Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1M1,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8,Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5;

    Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1M1;

    Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1M1;

    Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1M1;

    Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1M1,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:24:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号