首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education Policy >Policy fuzz and fuzzy logic: researching contemporary Indigenous education and parent-school engagement in north Australia
【24h】

Policy fuzz and fuzzy logic: researching contemporary Indigenous education and parent-school engagement in north Australia

机译:政策模糊和逻辑模糊:研究北澳大利亚的当代土著教育和家长学校参与

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

‘Engagement’ is the second of six top priorities in Australia's most recent Indigenous education strategy to ‘close the gap’ in schooling outcomes. Drawing on findings from a three‐year ethnographic analysis of school engagement issues in the north of Australia, this article situates engagement within the history of Indigenous education policy, followed by considerations of how many of the issues faced by Indigenous families both match and can be distinguished from those experienced among poor and underemployed social groups throughout the western world. We find that Indigenous people are content with the schools' engagement efforts and with their interactions with schools, accepting that how their lives are lived are not within the provenance of the school system to amend. In its homogenisation of Indigenous issues, reification of cultural distinction and foregrounding of disengagement as an issue, Australian education policy is also about non‐engagement, in that it excludes key issues from policy consideration while appearing to be inclusive. The education sector does not systematically engage with the grinding issues that Indigenous families face in their everyday worlds; and since Indigenous people do not really expect schools to know how to solve their issues, the call for engagement and its resolution is perfectly irresolvable.View full textDownload full textKeywordsengagement, Indigenous education, policy, race, urban minority groups, Australia, interventionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.509813
机译:“参与”是澳大利亚最新的“缩小差距”教育成绩的澳大利亚土著教育战略中的六个优先事项中的第二个。本文基于对澳大利亚北部学校参与问题的三年民族志分析结果,将参与度置于土著教育政策的历史范围内,然后考虑土著家庭面临的问题中有多少既可以匹配又可以匹配区别于西方世界贫困和就业不足的社会群体中的经验者。我们发现,土著人民对学校的参与努力和与学校的互动感到满意,他们接受他们的生活方式不在学校系统的修改范围之内。在将土著问题同质化,文化差异化和脱离接触作为一个问题的前景中,澳大利亚的教育政策也是关于非参与的,因为它在考虑到包容性的同时将主要问题排除在政策考虑之外。教育部门没有系统地处理土著家庭在日常生活中面临的严峻问题;而且由于土著人民并不真正希望学校知道如何解决他们的问题,因此对参与的呼声及其解决是完全无法解决的。查看全文下载全文关键字参与度,土著教育,政策,种族,城市少数群体,澳大利亚,干预相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.509813

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号